Reliability of automated versus handheld breast ultrasound examinations of suspicious breast masses
Gabin Yun, Sun Mi Kim, Bo La Yun, Hye Shin Ahn, Mijung Jang
Ultrasonography. 2019;38(3):264-271.   Published online 2018 Dec 23     DOI: https://doi.org/10.14366/usg.18055
Citations to this article as recorded by Crossref logo
Automated breast ultrasound: Supplemental screening for average-risk women with dense breasts
Georgia Giakoumis Spear, Ellen B. Mendelson
Clinical Imaging.2021; 76: 15.     CrossRef
Agreement in breast lesion assessment and final BI-RADS classification between radial and meander-like breast ultrasound
Pascale Brasier-Lutz, Claudia Jäggi-Wickes, Sabine Schaedelin, Rosemarie Burian, Cora-Ann Schoenenberger, Rosanna Zanetti-Dällenbach
BMC Medical Imaging.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
Automated versus handheld breast ultrasound examinations of suspicious breast masses: methodological errors in the reliability analysis
Siamak Sabour
Ultrasonography.2020; 39(1): 102.     CrossRef
Diagnostic performance of automated breast ultrasound and handheld ultrasound in women with dense breasts
Mengmeng Jia, Xi Lin, Xiang Zhou, Huijiao Yan, Yaqing Chen, Peifang Liu, Lingyun Bao, Anhua Li, Partha Basu, Youlin Qiao, Rengaswamy Sankaranarayanan
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.2020; 181(3): 589.     CrossRef