The current status of three-dimensional ultrasonography in gynaecology
Chiou Li Ong
Ultrasonography. 2016;35(1):13-24.   Published online 2015 Sep 25     DOI: https://doi.org/10.14366/usg.15043
Citations to this article as recorded by Crossref logo
Imaging evaluation of uterine perforation and rupture
Hassan Aboughalia, Deepashri Basavalingu, Margarita V. Revzin, Laura E. Sienas, Douglas S. Katz, Mariam Moshiri
Abdominal Radiology.2021; 46(10): 4946.     CrossRef
A Fast 3-Dimensional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Reconstruction for Surgical Planning of Uterine Myomectomy
Sa Ra Lee, Young Jae Kim, Kwang Gi Kim
Journal of Korean Medical Science.2018;[Epub]     CrossRef
Comparison between 3-dimensional cranial ultrasonography and conventional 2-dimensional cranial ultrasonography in neonates: impact on reinterpretation
Yu Jin Kim, Young Hun Choi, Hyun Hae Cho, So Mi Lee, Ji Eun Park, Jung-Eun Cheon, Woo Sun Kim, In-One Kim
Ultrasonography.2018; 37(1): 63.     CrossRef
Advanced Imaging for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Coexistent Renal and Müllerian Abnormalities
Aaron D. Coleman, Janeen L. Arbuckle
Current Urology Reports.2018;[Epub]     CrossRef
Uterine Malformations: An Update of Diagnosis, Management, and Outcomes
Bala Bhagavath, Ellie Greiner, Kara M. Griffiths, Tom Winter, Snigdha Alur-Gupta, Carter Richardson, Steven R. Lindheim
Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey.2017; 72(6): 377.     CrossRef
Assessment of the uterus with three-dimensional ultrasound in women undergoing ART
Sotirios H. Saravelos, Kannamannadiar Jayaprakasan, Kamal Ojha, Tin-Chiu Li
Human Reproduction Update.2016;[Epub]     CrossRef