False-negative results on computer-aided detection software in preoperative automated breast ultrasonography of breast cancer patients
Youngjune Kim, Jiwon Rim, Sun Mi Kim, Bo La Yun, So Yeon Park, Hye Shin Ahn, Bohyoung Kim, Mijung Jang
Ultrasonography. 2021;40(1):83-92. Published online 2020 Mar 24 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14366/usg.19076
Citations to this article as recorded by 
Diagnostic Performance of Artificial Intelligence–Based Computer-Aided Detection Software for Automated Breast Ultrasound
Mi-ri Kwon, Inyoung Youn, Mi Yeon Lee, Hyun-Ah Lee
Academic Radiology.2024; 31(2): 480. CrossRef
Quantitative ultrasound parameters from scattering and propagation may reduce the biopsy rate for breast tumor
Jiaqi Han, Pengfei Sun, Qizhen Sun, Zhun Xie, Lijun Xu, Xiangdong Hu, Jianguo Ma
Ultrasonics.2024; 138: 107233. CrossRef
Ultrasound for Breast Cancer Screening in Resource-Limited Settings: Current Practice and Future Directions
Qing Dan, Tingting Zheng, Li Liu, Desheng Sun, Yun Chen
Cancers.2023; 15(7): 2112. CrossRef
The lesion detection efficacy of deep learning on automatic breast ultrasound and factors affecting its efficacy: a pilot study
Xiao Luo PhD, Min Xu, Guoxue Tang, Yi Wang PhD, Na Wang, Dong Ni PhD, Xi Lin PhD, An-Hua Li
The British Journal of Radiology.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Evaluation of Computer-Aided Detection (CAD) in Screening Automated Breast Ultrasound Based on Characteristics of CAD Marks and False-Positive Marks
Jeongmin Lee, Bong Joo Kang, Sung Hun Kim, Ga Eun Park
Diagnostics.2022; 12(3): 583. CrossRef
Mitochondrial polarity-triggered fluorogenic optical agent for exploring breast cancer
Junling Yin, Xuefen Lin, Qingxia Hu, Shuhong Huang
Chemical Engineering Journal.2022; 450: 138282. CrossRef