![]() |
CrossRef Text and Data Mining |
Result of CrossRef Text and Data Mining Search is the related articles with entitled article. If you click link1 or link2 you will be able to reach the full text site of selected articles; however, some links do not show the full text immediately at now. If you click CrossRef Text and Data Mining Download icon, you will be able to get whole list of articles from literature included in CrossRef Text and Data Mining. |
Reliability of automated versus handheld breast ultrasound examinations of suspicious breast masses |
Gabin Yun, Sun Mi Kim, Bo La Yun, Hye Shin Ahn, Mijung Jang |
Ultrasonography. 2019;38(3):264-271. Published online 2018 December 23 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14366/usg.18055 |
Automated versus handheld breast ultrasound examinations of suspicious breast masses: methodological errors in the reliability analysis Reliability of automated versus handheld breast ultrasound examinations of suspicious breast masses Detectability and Usefulness of Automated Whole Breast Ultrasound in Patients with Suspicious Microcalcifications on Mammography: Comparison with Handheld Breast Ultrasound Agreement Between an Automated Volume Breast Scanner and Handheld Ultrasound for Diagnostic Breast Examinations Comparative Study of Automated Breast 3-D Ultrasound and Handheld B-Mode Ultrasound for Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Breast Masses Breast examinations with continuous wave and color Doppler Triple diagnostic approach versus ultrasound-guided 18 gauge core biopsy in suspicious breast masses 0683: Evaluation of Breast Masses: Role of Ultrasound Versus Mammography Mammographic and Ultrasound Analysis of Breast Masses 2090925 Opto-Acoustic (OA) Correlations With Histopathology For Suspicious Breast Masses |
This metadata service is kindly provided by CrossRef from May 29, 2014. Ultrasonography has participated in CrossRef Text and Data Mining service since October 29, 2014. |