![]() |
CrossRef Text and Data Mining |
Result of CrossRef Text and Data Mining Search is the related articles with entitled article. If you click link1 or link2 you will be able to reach the full text site of selected articles; however, some links do not show the full text immediately at now. If you click CrossRef Text and Data Mining Download icon, you will be able to get whole list of articles from literature included in CrossRef Text and Data Mining. |
Automated versus handheld breast ultrasound examinations of suspicious breast masses: methodological errors in the reliability analysis |
Siamak Sabour |
Ultrasonography. 2020;39(1):102-103. Published online 2019 August 1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14366/usg.19038 |
Automated versus handheld breast ultrasound examinations of suspicious breast masses: methodological errors in the reliability analysis Reliability of automated versus handheld breast ultrasound examinations of suspicious breast masses Detectability and Usefulness of Automated Whole Breast Ultrasound in Patients with Suspicious Microcalcifications on Mammography: Comparison with Handheld Breast Ultrasound Triple diagnostic approach versus ultrasound-guided 18 gauge core biopsy in suspicious breast masses Comparative Study of Automated Breast 3-D Ultrasound and Handheld B-Mode Ultrasound for Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Breast Masses Mammographic and Ultrasound Analysis of Breast Masses 229. Breast Imaging Quality: Conventional Handheld Ultrasound versus Automated 3D Breast Ultrasound System Automatic Breast Volume Scanner versus Handheld Ultrasound in Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Breast Lesions: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Comparison of the background echotexture between automated breast ultrasound and handheld breast ultrasound Breast examinations with continuous wave and color Doppler |
This metadata service is kindly provided by CrossRef from May 29, 2014. Ultrasonography has participated in CrossRef Text and Data Mining service since October 29, 2014. |