CrossRef Text and Data Mining
Result of CrossRef Text and Data Mining Search is the related articles with entitled article. If you click link1 or link2 you will be able to reach the full text site of selected articles; however, some links do not show the full text immediately at now. If you click CrossRef Text and Data Mining Download icon, you will be able to get whole list of articles from literature included in CrossRef Text and Data Mining.
Transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy versus combined magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion and systematic biopsy for prostate cancer detection in routine clinical practice
Jae Heung Bae, See Hyung Kim
Ultrasonography. 2020;39(2):137-143.   Published online 2019 November 26    DOI: https://doi.org/10.14366/usg.19036

Excel Download

Transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy versus combined magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion and systematic biopsy for prostate cancer detection in routine clinical practice
Ultrasonography. 2020;39(2):137-143   Crossref logo
Link1 Link2 Link3

Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound Fusion-guided Transperineal Versus Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound Fusion-guided Transrectal Prostate Biopsy—A Systematic Review
European Urology Oncology. 2021;   Crossref logo
Link1 Link2

The Role of Ipsilateral and Contralateral Transrectal Ultrasound-guided Systematic Prostate Biopsy in Men With Unilateral Magnetic Resonance Imaging Lesion Undergoing Magnetic Resonance Imaging-ultrasound Fusion-targeted Prostate Biopsy
Urology. 2017;102:178-182   Crossref logo
Link1 Link2

912 Comparison of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Cognitive Prostate Biopsy Versus Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Ultrasound Fusion Prostate Biopsy in The Detection of Prostate Cancer
British Journal of Surgery. 2021;108(Supplement_2):   Crossref logo
Link1 Link2

Does magnetic resonance imaging–guided biopsy improve prostate cancer detection? A comparison of systematic, cognitive fusion and ultrasound fusion prostate biopsy
Prostate International. 2018;6(3):88-93   Crossref logo
Link1 Link2

Magnetic resonance imaging-transrectal ultrasound fusion image-guided prostate biopsy: Current status of the cancer detection and the prospects of tailor-made medicine of the prostate cancer
Investigative and Clinical Urology. 2019;60(1):4   Crossref logo
Link1 Link2 Link3

Re: M. Minhaj Siddiqui, Soroush Rais-Bahrami, Hong Truong, et al. Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound–Fusion Biopsy Significantly Upgrades Prostate Cancer Versus Systematic 12-core Transrectal Ultrasound Biopsy. Eur Urol 2013;64:713–9 and Re: Mark Emberton. Has Magnetic Resonance–Guided Biopsy of the Prostate Become the Standard of Care? Eur Urol 2013;64:720–1
European Urology. 2014;65(6):e106-e107   Crossref logo
Link1 Link2

Assessment of the Performance of Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound Fusion Guided Prostate Biopsy against a Combined Targeted Plus Systematic Biopsy Approach Using 24-Core Transperineal Template Saturation Mapping Prostate Biopsy
Prostate Cancer. 2016;2016:1-8   Crossref logo
Link1 Link2 Link3

3D versus 2D Systematic Transrectal Ultrasound-Guided Prostate Biopsy: Higher Cancer Detection Rate in Clinical Practice
Prostate Cancer. 2013;2013:1-5   Crossref logo
Link1 Link2 Link3

Re: Prospective Assessment of Prostate Cancer Aggressiveness Using 3-T Diffusion-weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging–guided Biopsies Versus a Systematic 10-core Transrectal Ultrasound Prostate Biopsy Cohort
European Urology. 2012;62(4):731-732   Crossref logo
Link1 Link2

This metadata service is kindly provided by CrossRef from May 29, 2014. Ultrasonography has participated in CrossRef Text and Data Mining service since October 29, 2014.