CrossRef Text and Data Mining
Result of CrossRef Text and Data Mining Search is the related articles with entitled article. If you click link1 or link2 you will be able to reach the full text site of selected articles; however, some links do not show the full text immediately at now. If you click CrossRef Text and Data Mining Download icon, you will be able to get whole list of articles from literature included in CrossRef Text and Data Mining.
Transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy versus combined magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion and systematic biopsy for prostate cancer detection in routine clinical practice
Jae Heung Bae, See Hyung Kim
Ultrasonography. 2020;39(2):137-143.   Published online 2019 November 26    DOI: https://doi.org/10.14366/usg.19036

Excel Download

Transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy versus combined magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion and systematic biopsy for prostate cancer detection in routine clinical practice
Ultrasonography. 2020;39(2):137-143   Crossref logo
Link1 Link2 Link3

The Role of Ipsilateral and Contralateral Transrectal Ultrasound-guided Systematic Prostate Biopsy in Men With Unilateral Magnetic Resonance Imaging Lesion Undergoing Magnetic Resonance Imaging-ultrasound Fusion-targeted Prostate Biopsy
Urology. 2017;102:178-182   Crossref logo
Link1 Link2

Prospective Evaluation of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Guided In-bore Prostate Biopsy versus Systematic Transrectal Ultrasound Guided Prostate Biopsy in Biopsy Naïve Men with Elevated Prostate Specific Antigen
Journal of Urology. 2014;192(5):1374-1379   Crossref logo
Link1 Link2

Re: M. Minhaj Siddiqui, Soroush Rais-Bahrami, Hong Truong, et al. Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound–Fusion Biopsy Significantly Upgrades Prostate Cancer Versus Systematic 12-core Transrectal Ultrasound Biopsy. Eur Urol 2013;64:713–9 and Re: Mark Emberton. Has Magnetic Resonance–Guided Biopsy of the Prostate Become the Standard of Care? Eur Urol 2013;64:720–1
European Urology. 2014;65(6):e106-e107   Crossref logo
Link1 Link2

Does magnetic resonance imaging–guided biopsy improve prostate cancer detection? A comparison of systematic, cognitive fusion and ultrasound fusion prostate biopsy
Prostate International. 2018;6(3):88-93   Crossref logo
Link1 Link2

Prospective Study of Diagnostic Accuracy Comparing Prostate Cancer Detection by Transrectal Ultrasound–Guided Biopsy Versus Magnetic Resonance (MR) Imaging with Subsequent MR-guided Biopsy in Men Without Previous Prostate Biopsies
European Urology. 2014;66(1):22-29   Crossref logo
Link1 Link2

Significance of MRI/Transrectal Ultrasound Fusion Three-Dimensional Model-Guided, Targeted Biopsy Based on Transrectal Ultrasound-Guided Systematic Biopsy in Prostate Cancer Detection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Urologia Internationalis. 2017;100(1):57-65   Crossref logo
Link1 Link2

Comparison of Magnetic Resonance/Ultrasound Fusion-Guided Biopsy With Ultrasound-Guided Biopsy for the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer
Urology. 2016;89:6-7   Crossref logo
Link1 Link2

Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Ultrasound Fusion Biopsy Detect Prostate Cancer in Patients with Prior Negative Transrectal Ultrasound Biopsies
Yearbook of Urology. 2013;2013:138-139   Crossref logo
Link1 Link2

Magnetic resonance imaging-transrectal ultrasound fusion image-guided prostate biopsy: Current status of the cancer detection and the prospects of tailor-made medicine of the prostate cancer
Investigative and Clinical Urology. 2019;60(1):4   Crossref logo
Link1 Link2 Link3

This metadata service is kindly provided by CrossRef from May 29, 2014. Ultrasonography has participated in CrossRef Text and Data Mining service since October 29, 2014.