CrossRef Text and Data Mining

Result of CrossRef Text and Data Mining Search is the related articles with entitled article. If you click link1 or link2 you will be able to reach the full text site of selected articles; however, some links do not show the full text immediately at now. If you click CrossRef Text and Data Mining Download icon, you will be able to get whole list of articles from literature included in CrossRef Text and Data Mining.

A comparison of the diagnostic performance of the O-RADS, RMI4, IOTA LR2, and IOTA SR systems by senior and junior doctors

Yuyang Guo, Baihua Zhao, Shan Zhou, Lieming Wen, Jieyu Liu, Yaqian Fu, Fang Xu, Minghui Liu

Ultrasonography. 2022;41(3):511-518. Published online 2022 January 31 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14366/usg.21237

A comparison of the diagnostic performance of the O-RADS, RMI4, IOTA LR2, and IOTA SR systems by senior and junior doctors

Yuyang Guo, Baihua Zhao, Shan Zhou, Lieming Wen, Jieyu Liu, Yaqian Fu, Fang Xu, Minghui Liu

Ultrasonography. 2022;41(3):511-518

Link1

Link2 Link3

OC04.05: Sonographic assessment of ovarian masses: comparative retrospective cohort study on accuracy of IOTA LR1 versus IOTA LR2 versus Sassone scoring system

R.L. Salvador, M. De Vera

Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2015;46:8-8

Link1 Link2

Prospective evaluation of the IOTA logistic regression model LR2 for the diagnosis of ovarian cancer

N. Nunes, J. Yazbek, G. Ambler, W. Hoo, J. Naftalin, D. Jurkovic

Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2012;40(3):355-359

Link1 Link2 Link3

OC04.02: Diagnostic performance of International Ovarian Tumour Analysis (IOTA) logistic regression model (LR2) for adnexal masses classification in a tertiary centre

W. Tan, S. Lee, P. Partana

Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2018;52:7-8

Link1 Link2

P11.01: Diagnostic accuracy of IOTA ADNEX and IOTA LR2 model compared with subjective assessment ( SA) in differentiating benign and malignant ovarian masses

M. Pietryga, A. Horala, A. Paluszkiewicz, N. Izycka, K. Tobola, P. Banach, J. Brazert, E. Nowak-Markwitz

Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2017;50:187-187

Link1 Link2

VP04.17: Comparison of performance between IOTA Simple Rules, IOTA ADNEX model and O‐RADS in the discrimination of adnexal masses in an oncology centre

S. Passos Silva, S. Raposo, F. Coutinho, R. Sousa, L. Sá

Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2021;58(S1):108-109

Link1 Link2 Link3

Comparison of performance between O-RADS, IOTA Simple Rules Risk assessment and ADNEX model in the discrimination of ovarian Brenner tumors

SHANG JIANHONG, Ting Lei, LiHong Wu, MeiFang Lin, Hong-Ning Xie

. 2022;

Link1 Link2

P27.14: Diagnosis of adnexal masses: validation of the IOTA logistic regression model (LR2) in comparison to subjective pattern recognition

A. Pinto, F. Alves, A.M. Alves

Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2014;44(S1):346-346

Link1 Link2

OC14.07: The predictive value of subjective assessment, IOTA simple rules (SR), IOTA logistic regression model 1 (LR1), Alcazar's GI-RADS model and a risk of malignancy (RMI) model in the preoperative discrimination of adnexal masses

A. Czekierdowski, J. Koneczny, D. Borowski, J. Danilos, J. Kraczkowski

Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2013;42(s1):29-29

Link1 Link2

Diagnostic Added-Value of Serum CA-125 on the IOTA Simple Rules and Derivation of Practical Combined Prediction Models (IOTA SR X CA-125)

Phichayut Phinyo, Jayanton Patumanond, Panprapha Saenrungmuaeng, Watcharin Chirdchim, Tanyong Pipanmekaporn, Apichat Tantraworasin, Theera Tongsong, Charuwan Tantipalakorn

Diagnostics. 2021;11(2):173

Link1

This metadata service is kindly provided by CrossRef from May 29, 2014. Ultrasonography has participated in CrossRef Text and Data Mining service since October 29, 2014.