CrossRef Text and Data Mining

Result of CrossRef Text and Data Mining Search is the related articles with entitled article. If you click link1 or link2 you will be able to reach the full text site of selected articles; however, some links do not show the full text immediately at now. If you click CrossRef Text and Data Mining Download icon, you will be able to get whole list of articles from literature included in CrossRef Text and Data Mining.

Comparison of the diagnostic yield of various systematic randomized prostate biopsy protocols using prostate phantoms made of devil's tongue jelly

Sung Il Hwang, Hak Jong Lee

Ultrasonography. 2019;38(1):44-49. Published online 2018 April 6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14366/usg.18003

Comparison of the diagnostic yield of various systematic randomized prostate biopsy protocols using prostate phantoms made of devil's tongue jelly

Sung Il Hwang, Hak Jong Lee

Ultrasonography. 2019;38(1):44-49

Link1

Link2 Link3

A prospective randomized comparison of extensive prostate biopsy to standard biopsy with assessment of diagnostic yield, biopsy pain and morbidity

R L Sur, P G Borboroglu, J L Roberts, C L Amling

Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases. 2004;7(2):126-131

Link1

Link2 Link3

Diagnostic yield of fusion magnetic resonance-guided prostate biopsy versus cognitive-guided biopsy in biopsy-naive patients: a head-to-head randomized controlled trial

Mohammad-Hossein Izadpanahi, Amirreza Elahian, Farshad Gholipour, Mohammad-Hatef Khorrami, Mahtab Zargham, Mehrdad Mohammadi Sichani, Farshid Alizadeh, Farbod Khorrami

Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases. 2021;24(4):1103-1109

Link1

Link2 Link3

A prospective randomized comparison of diagnostic efficacy between transperineal and transrectal 12-core prostate biopsy

A Takenaka, R Hara, T Ishimura, T Fujii, Y Jo, A Nagai, M Fujisawa

Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases. 2007;11(2):134-138

Link1

Link2 Link3

Comparison of MRI/US Fusion Targeted Biopsy and Systematic Biopsy in Biopsy-Naïve Prostate Patients with Elevated Prostate-Specific Antigen: A Diagnostic Study

Chen Huang, Yuhua Huang, Jinxian Pu, Qilin Xi, Xuedong Wei, Feng Qiu, Ximing Wang, Xiaojun Zhao, Linchuan Guo, Jianquan Hou

Cancer Management and Research. 2022;Volume 14:1395-1407

Link1 Link2

A prospective randomized comparison of diagnostic efficacy between transperineal and transrectal 12-core prostate biopsy

J.T. Wei

Yearbook of Urology. 2008;2008:152-153

Link1 Link2

Prostate cancer: diagnostic yield of modified transrectal ultrasound-guided twelve-core combined biopsy (targeted plus systematic biopsies) using prebiopsy magnetic resonance imaging

Chorog Song, Sung Yoon Park

Abdominal Radiology. 2021;46(10):4974-4983

Link1

Link2 Link3

Does magnetic resonance imaging–guided biopsy improve prostate cancer detection? A comparison of systematic, cognitive fusion and ultrasound fusion prostate biopsy

Jonathan Kam, Yuigi Yuminaga, Raymond Kim, Kushlan Aluwihare, Finlay Macneil, Rupert Ouyang, Stephen Ruthven, Mark Louie-Johnsun

Prostate International. 2018;6(3):88-93

Link1 Link2

Assessment of the Performance of Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound Fusion Guided Prostate Biopsy against a Combined Targeted Plus Systematic Biopsy Approach Using 24-Core Transperineal Template Saturation Mapping Prostate Biopsy

Francis Ting, Pim J. Van Leeuwen, James Thompson, Ron Shnier, Daniel Moses, Warick Delprado, Phillip D. Stricker

Prostate Cancer. 2016;2016:1-8

Link1

Link2 Link3

A direct comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of three prostate cancer nomograms designed to predict the likelihood of a positive initial transrectal biopsy

Idir Ouzaid, David R. Yates, Vincent Hupertan, Pierre Mozer, Emmanuel Chartier-Kastler, Alain Haertig, Marc-Olivier Bitker, Morgan Rouprêt

The Prostate. 2011;72(11):1200-1206

Link1 Link2 Link3

This metadata service is kindly provided by CrossRef from May 29, 2014. Ultrasonography has participated in CrossRef Text and Data Mining service since October 29, 2014.