Kotewall and Lang: High-intensity focused ultrasound ablation as a treatment for benign thyroid diseases: the present and future


High-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) is a promising ablation technique for benign thyroid nodules. Current evidence has found good short- to medium-term outcomes, similar to those of better-established ablation techniques such as radiofrequency and laser ablation. The fact that it does not require insertion of a needle into the target makes HIFU a truly non-invasive treatment. Although it is not without risks, its low risk profile makes it an attractive alternative to surgery. There is much room for future development, starting from expanding the current indications to enhancing energy delivery. Relapsed Graves disease and papillary microcarcinoma are diseases that can benefit from HIFU treatment. Its role in the mediation of immune responses and synergistic effects with immunotherapy are promising in the fight against metastatic cancers.


Nodular goiters and thyroid nodules are clinically palpable in about 5% of the general population. When visualized using ultrasonography, the prevalence of thyroid nodules is even higher, with reported rates as high as 60% [1,2]. Fortunately, despite the high prevalence, most of these nodules are benign in nature and will remain static over time; as such, no active intervention is required [3]. However, up to 10%-15% of these nodules can progress and grow, and some can even cause obstructive symptoms [4]. In such circumstances, surgery is indicated [2]. However, surgery results in morbidity and requires general anesthesia and hospitalization [5]. As a result, there has been an increasing interest in developing less invasive, non-surgical techniques for treating sizable or growing thyroid nodules [6]. For predominantly-solid or solid nodules, image-guided thermal ablation techniques such as laser ablation (LA), microwave ablation, and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) are the most established [7,8]. They have been shown to be effective not only in causing physical shrinkage, but also in improving nodule-related symptoms.
High-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) is a relatively new ablation technique that has been less thoroughly described. It utilizes focused ultrasonic energy to induce tissue ablation, and therefore does not require the insertion of a needle or probe through the skin. Like other ablation techniques, it is effective in causing significant nodule shrinkage and rapidly alleviating obstructive symptoms [9-11]. Although the longer-term outcomes of this modality remain unclear, there is an increasing interest in this technique. Therefore, it would be timely to examine the current development and future directions of this technology for the treatment of thyroid diseases.

Focused Ultrasound Technology

The concept of using ultrasonic energy as a penetrating force to destroy tissue at a distance originated in the last century and was summarized by Kremkau in the 1970s [12]. In the 1950s, researchers such as Barnard et al. [13] and Fry and colleagues [14-16] from Illinois in the United States applied ultrasonic energy in a clinical setting by treating Parkinson disease and other neurological conditions with focused ultrasound energy. However, it was not until the 1990s that interest in applying HIFU therapy in the treatment of solid tumors emerged again.
HIFU is based on the unique characteristic of sound waves between the frequencies of 0.8 to 3.5 MHz, which can be intensified to focus at a distance from the radiating transducer. The harnessed acoustic energy (up to 10,000 W/cm2) causes intense vibrations of tissue, generating heat that causes necrosis at the target location without collateral damage to the surrounding structures. The benefit of inducing immediate tissue death from a distance by an ultrasonic energy source without the need of invasive surgery or insertion of ablation instruments makes HIFU an attractive therapeutic option. Although data on the efficacy of HIFU are still being gathered, the initial results obtained from pioneering researchers in Asia have been encouraging regarding the treatment of solid tumors, such as those in the liver and kidneys [17-23].
The mechanism of injury induced by HIFU is two-fold, thermal and mechanical. In thermal injury, injury occurs as a result of maintaining a high temperature within the target. A temperature of 56℃ or above causes protein denaturation and coagulative necrosis in seconds [24]. At this temperature, water within body tissues starts to vaporize, and microbubbles begin to form within the target. Mechanical injury, in contrast, is related to the process of cavitation [25,26]. This is a process where bubbles develop and enlarge within the target. As multiple bubbles expand and collapse, mechanical damage to nearby cells occurs. The popcorn effect is the typical example of cavitation [25]. Through these mechanisms, irreversible cell death occurs via coagulative necrosis and apoptosis.
Other important biological effects of HIFU also take place after treatment. Cells undergo subtle changes in response to exposure to ultrasonic energy, resulting in cell arrest. Cellular membranes also become more permeable, leading to changes in the intracellular milieu [26]. This effect on intracellular proteins leads to cell arrest. The resultant cell death triggers the activation of immune cells such as natural killer cells, CD8+ T cells, and dendritic cells, which roam the bloodstream to detect and destroy tumor cells both locally and systemically [26].
Since the HIFU energy is concentrated in a small area, the damage to the overlying structures is minimal and the temperature outside the focal point remains low. This property helps to minimize inadvertent collateral damage.

Current Devices and Procedures

To date, only one commercial device has been approved and is available for the ablation of thyroid nodules. The procedure is done entirely under ultrasound guidance. The device itself has an energy generator, a treatment head, a skin cooling device, and a touch-screen interface for planning (Fig. 1). The treatment head incorporates an image transducer (7.5 MHz, 128 elements, linear array) and an HIFU transducer (3 MHz, single element, 60 mm in diameter). Before the treatment starts, the treatment head is placed on the neck on the side of the index nodule and is finely adjusted until the nodule is within the treatable depth of 7 to 30 mm from the skin surface. Once marked on the treatment screen, the device’s computer automatically divides the nodule into multiple ablation voxels. Each voxel measures approximately 7.3 mm in thickness and 5 mm in width and receives a continuous 8-second pulse of HIFU energy followed by 20-30 seconds of cooling time before the beam moves on to the next voxel (Fig. 2). To ensure safety, nearby structures such as the carotid artery, trachea, and skin are marked on the treatment screen before the start of treatment by the operator [27-29]. To avoid inadvertent heat injury to important surrounding structures, the device automatically selects safety margins for the skin, the trachea, and the ipsilateral carotid artery. A laser-based movement detector enables immediate power interruption when the patient moves or swallows during ablation. To avoid skin burn, the skin is cooled by a balloon (filled with 10℃ liquid) at the tip of the treatment head. Both the total amount of energy delivered to the nodule (in kilojoules) and the "on-beam" (sonification) time taken (in minutes) are automatically recorded by the device's computer. The on-beam treatment time is the duration from the first to the last pulse (in minutes). On average, the total onbeam time for a 3-cm nodule ranges from 30 to 45 minutes [29-32], while for larger-sized nodules (i.e., with a volume >30 mL), two or more sequential treatments might be necessary in order to achieve complete ablation. In comparison to other, more established ablation techniques such as RFA or LA, HIFU generally takes almost twice as long. However, this problem can be resolved by shortening the cooling period between each treatment pulse with new ablation software. An oral diet is resumed immediately afterwards and patients can be discharged home 2-3 hours after treatment.

Pain Control during Treatment

Good pain control is an important aspect of ensuring successful HIFU treatment, because pain can often lead to incomplete or suboptimal ablation of the target. Although the exact source or origin of the pain is unclear, pain is likely to be felt as high levels of ultrasound energy travel from the skin into the target. To alleviate some of this pain, a local infiltration of 1% lidocaine around the thyroid gland is often used. In addition, we often administer intravenous pethidine and diazepam boluses at the start of treatment. To date, this combination has worked well, and up to 15% of patients reported experiencing absolutely no pain during treatment [30]. For more posteriorly located nodules, some patients may complain of pain or discomfort arising from the back of the neck and shoulder areas. This might occur because some of the HIFU energy may travel through the thyroid gland into the paraspinal muscles beneath the pre-vertebral fascia. To alleviate this, the operator can reduce the treatment depth or reduce the power of each treatment pulse. Interestingly, a research group has recently described the feasibility of low-energy HIFU ablation in thyroid nodules without the need for any anesthesia or analgesia [11]. Therefore, it is possible to deliver good ablation without anesthesia or analgesia by setting the power of each treatment pulse to its minimum setting.

Short-Term Efficacy

In terms of treatment efficacy following single treatments, HIFU can generally achieve a volume shrinkage of the nodule between 45% to 70%, depending on the initial size of the nodule (Fig. 3) [9-11,28]. In our experience, small-sized nodules tend to respond better than large-sized nodules to single rounds of treatment. A previous study showed that for nodules larger than 30 mL, the mean 6-month volume reduction was 48%, while for intermediate-sized nodules (10-30 mL), the mean volume reduction was 68% [27]. For small nodules (less than 10 mL), the mean volume reduction was 78% [27]. However, it is worth pointing out that there is no well-defined upper limit for HIFU ablation, and single ablations can certainly be applied to nodules measuring up to 5 cm in diameter [27]. A strategy proposed to achieve better efficacy is to perform two sequential treatments of the same nodule. However, this strategy has yet to be evaluated in the literature.
Apart from the physical shrinkage of nodules, it is worth highlighting that HIFU leads to improvements in the severity of pressure symptoms arising from nodules over a period of 12 months. Relative to patients who were managed expectantly, at 12 months, patients who underwent HIFU ablation reported significantly fewer pressure symptoms and better physical composite scores (as measured by a visual analogue scale [VAS] with scores of 0-10 and a standard health-related quality of life tool, respectively) [10]. Interestingly, there was a significant correlation between physical composite scores and 6- and 12-month reductions in nodule size [10].

Treatment-Related Risks

Vocal cord paresis (VCP) is defined as a reduction or absence of movement in one or both of the vocal cords. It is the most common complication following HIFU ablation of thyroid nodules. The incidence of VCP after HIFU has been reported to be approximately 1%-2% when the vocal cords are examined routinely after each procedure. The reason for its occurrence is because the recurrent laryngeal nerve runs closely behind the thyroid lobe in the tracheoesophageal groove, and if the nodule (or target) is located near the posterior thyroid capsule, close to the tracheoesophageal groove, either the heat or the HIFU wave itself can easily damage the nerve, resulting in VCP. This proposal is supported by a previous study that found the distance between the focus of the HIFU beam and the tracheoesophageal groove to be significantly related to the risk of VCP. To avoid VCP, a safe distance of 1.1 cm between the focus of the beam and the tracheoesophageal groove is essential [29].
Other complications, such as inadvertent skin burns and hypothyroidism, are rare. To avoid burning the skin, special attention must be paid during treatment to possible changes of the tumor location caused by the patient’s movement. Overshooting or undershooting of the nodule by the HIFU beam can cause inadvertent heat damage to the skin or deeper neck structures. A rise in the temperature of the skin surface may occur, and regular monitoring of skin changes is therefore crucial for preventing thermal injury. Fortunately, skin burns after HIFU ablation are extremely rare (<1%) when precautions have been taken. An additional safety mechanism is installed to interrupt the energy delivery in case of sudden body movements in order to decrease the incidence and severity of skin burns. Hypothyroidism as a direct result of HIFU ablation is very uncommon because the beam is normally focused at the center of the target, without damaging the surrounding functional parenchyma; therefore, the underlying thyroid function remains unaltered after treatment [31].

Long-Term Treatment Outcomes

Although HIFU is a promising form of ablation in the short-term, the medium- to long-term outcomes following a single HIFU treatment are not well established. In contrast to other ablation techniques such as RFA or LA, it is unclear whether the initial shrinkage from the HIFU ablation can persist beyond 12 months. Given that nodule regrowth can occur after thermal ablation, it is important to evaluate the longer-term outcomes of HIFU ablation. However, the current problem, of course, that the follow-up period for the treated nodules remains short and a longer follow-up period is required. To date, only a single study has reported the medium-term efficacy after single HIFU ablations of benign thyroid nodules. In that study, a total of 108 patients were analyzed and followed for 2 years. At 2 years, fewer than two-thirds (63/108, 58.3%) of nodules had a smaller volume (by >4.5%) than at 12 months, while about one-fifth of nodules (20.4%) had a small increase in volume compared to the volumes at 12 months [32]. However, the overall nodule shrinkage rates at 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months were 51.32%±20.71%, 62.99%±22.05%, 68.66%±18.48%, 69.76%±17.88%, and 70.41%±17.39%, respectively [32].

Role of a Second Round of HIFU Treatment

With greater experience, it has become clear that all thyroid nodules can shrink satisfactorily with a single treatment. In previous studies, approximately 20% of benign thyroid nodules failed to shrink by >50% in volume at 6 months [10,27]. Although surgical resection remains a viable treatment option when an ablated nodule has failed to shrink satisfactorily and is causing persistent obstructive symptoms, many patients still prefer a less invasive approach. The results of two or more treatments (reapplications) have been reported for other thermal ablation techniques [33,34], but this is less well-described for HIFU ablation. In a recent study of 28 patients who did not achieve 50% volume reduction at 6 months after the first HIFU treatment, the second treatment (or reapplication) of the same nodule yielded a further shrinkage (or volume reduction rate) of 21.78%±16.87% after 6 months. In short, the results of reapplication of HIFU ablation were not overwhelmingly encouraging. Nevertheless, the baseline symptom score (by VAS) (3.96±1.04) improved at 3 and 6 months after reapplication (2.96±1.43, P<0.001 and 2.58±1.39, P<0.001, respectively). Therefore, this option might still be worthwhile when a nodule has not shrunken after the first treatment. Interestingly, it was found that larger residual nodules experienced greater shrinkage than smaller residual nodules after the second treatment [35]. One reason for this might be that it is technically more difficult to focus on the un-ablated part of the nodule when it is small in volume.

Future Developments

There are still many unanswered questions related to the use of this technology in clinical practice. An active research area relates to the use of HIFU in the management of patients with relapsed Graves disease. The principle of this treatment is not dissimilar to that of subtotal thyroid resection, where the bulk of the functioning thyroid parenchyma is removed or de-functioned, leaving a smaller amount of viable thyroid tissue. The aim of the procedure involves thermal ablation of the center of both the right and left thyroid lobes, while leaving the peripheral parenchyma functional. In a pilot study, at 1 year, approximately 67% of patients remained free of anti-thyroid medications [36], and 3% experienced temporary vocal cord palsy. Therefore, HIFU may be a safe and efficacious treatment for patients with persistent or relapsed Graves disease. However, a randomized comparative study (between HIFU and other definitive treatments) is needed in order to recommend this treatment as a sound alternative for this condition.
Apart from Graves disease, other indications include locoregional recurrence of papillary thyroid carcinoma, as well as primary thyroid carcinoma. In a series of 39 patients, Lim et al. [37] tested HIFU for this indication by treating 61 recurrent papillary thyroid tumors and found that RFA could effectively control loco-regional recurrent papillary thyroid carcinoma without life-threatening complications; in other words, RFA may have a role in replacing "berry-picking surgery" in selected patients. Although considered to be the standard treatment for recurrence, repeated neck operations for recurrence are challenging and potentially hazardous due to the distortion of normal anatomy, which is replaced by adhesions and scar tissue, resulting in more morbidity, such as hypoparathyroidism and vocal cord palsy. Using ablation to treat recurrent cancer can be advantageous, since it is less invasive and can reduce complications. Another indication is for primary thyroid cancer. Since RFA is a potential treatment alternative for low-risk papillary thyroid microcarcinoma [38], it is certainly possible for HIFU to be used to treat small, low-risk papillary thyroid carcinomas.
Another area of research is the identification of early biomarkers or serum markers in predicting nodule shrinkage after ablation. At the moment, there is no way of knowing whether a nodule will shrink satisfactorily shortly after ablation. If a biomarker is available shortly after treatment, it could be possible to plan additional treatment earlier. In a previous study, the authors found that there was a significant rise in serum thyroglobulin (Tg) in the first few days after ablation. On average, the serum Tg level rose by 7-10 times in the first 4 days after ablation, suggesting that the degree of Tg elevation might be correlated with the extent of shrinkage [39]. More recently, it was found that a drop in anti-Tg levels on day 4 could also be used as a predictor of nodule shrinkage in patients with positive anti-Tg status [40].
With advances in technology, it is not unreasonable to expect better treatment results in terms of shortening the treatment time while maximizing the energy delivery. Although technological improvements fall outside the purview of physicians, increased experience with the modality will undoubtedly shorten the learning curve. One such recent advancement is the development of nanodroplets that, when injected intravenously, potentiate the effects of the ultrasonic energy. So far, experimental studies using intravenous nanodroplets have only been done in rat liver. However, the results are promising. HIFU-mediated liver damage was significantly enhanced with mixed perfluorocarbon nanodroplets when compared with HIFU alone [41]. When compared with a control arm of HIFU without an agent, the injection of nanodroplets achieved a 130% higher temperature and an ablated area that was 30 times greater than that of the control group [41]. This agent increased the ablation capacity by reducing the acoustic energy required to heat the lesion. While there was an increase in energy delivery, there was no corresponding increase in collateral damage to healthy tissue. In other words, the use of nanodroplets could reduce the procedure time without increasing the risk of burning the skin.
Finally, and perhaps most remarkably, there is an immunological aspect of HIFU that has gained increasing interest. Interest has emerged in using HIFU as an immune-modulating agent that might synergistically potentiate the effects of immunotherapy (like a programmed cell death ligand 1 inhibitor) in the treatment of metastatic cancers. As alluded to earlier regarding the immune response of cells to HIFU [24], cell death as a result of ablation triggers a cascade leading to downstream stimulation of the systemic response. This unexpected but powerful sequence of events can be manipulated to aid immunotherapy [42]. HIFU, a technique initially developed for local control, in fact has systemic ramifications. Thermal ablation may induce both regional and systemic production of cytokines through the activation of inflammatory cells. In studies using RFA, when compared with the control arm, serum interferon-gamma and vascular endothelial growth factor levels markedly increased after treatment [43]. In animal models, HIFU may modulate host antitumor immunity after the ablation of implanted neuroblastoma. The number of cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) and activated tumor-specific CTLs significantly increased. The same phenomenon has been observed in implanted colonic adenocarcinoma and melanoma [44]. In addition, dendritic cell infiltration of tumors was enhanced by HIFU ablation. A possible explanation is that the tumor left behind after ablation can induce a tumor-specific immune response, including the induction of CTL cytotoxic activity and enhanced activation of dendritic cells [44]. In essence, the residual cancer debris acts as an antigen for the immune system. The use of HIFU may reduce distant metastasis and potentially prevent local recurrence through activation of cancer patients’ immune system. Based on these findings, there is increasing interest in using HIFU and taking advantage of its immunological stimulation to enhance adjuvant immunotherapy. A phase I clinical trial is currently exploring the effects of HIFU on adjuvant immunotherapy. While the experiment is ongoing, the results of this prospective randomized controlled trial will have implications for the treatment protocol of metastatic solid tumors.


HIFU is a novel ablation technique that can cause effective shrinkage of thyroid nodules and alleviate pressure symptoms. Its main treatment indication remains benign thyroid nodules. Although the published results are promising, prospective studies with a longer follow-up period are required. Future possibilities include evaluating its role in Graves disease and low-risk malignant conditions, as well as exploring its synergistic effect with systemic immunotherapy.

Conflicts of Interest

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.


1. Gharib H, Papini E, Garber JR, Duick DS, Harrell RM, Hegedus L, et al. American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, American College of Endocrinology, and Associazione Medici Endocrinologi medical guidelines for clinical practice for the diagnosis and management of thyroid nodules: 2016 update. Endocr Pract 2016;22:622–639.
crossref pmid
2. Haugen BR, Alexander EK, Bible KC, Doherty GM, Mandel SJ, Nikiforov YE, et al. 2015 American Thyroid Association management guidelines for adult patients with thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer: the American Thyroid Association Guidelines Task Force on Thyroid Nodules and Differentiated Thyroid Cancer. Thyroid 2016;26:1–133.
crossref pmid pmc
3. Lee L, Mitmaker EJ, Chabot JA, Lee JA, Kuo JH. Cost-effectiveness of diagnostic lobectomy versus observation for thyroid nodules >4 cm. Thyroid 2016;26:271–279.
crossref pmid
4. Durante C, Costante G, Lucisano G, Bruno R, Meringolo D, Paciaroni A, et al. The natural history of benign thyroid nodules. JAMA 2015;313:926–935.
crossref pmid
5. Bergenfelz A, Jansson S, Kristoffersson A, Martensson H, Reihner E, Wallin G, et al. Complications to thyroid surgery: results as reported in a database from a multicenter audit comprising 3,660 patients. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2008;393:667–673.
crossref pmid
6. Gharib H, Hegedus L, Pacella CM, Baek JH, Papini E. Clinical review: nonsurgical, image-guided, minimally invasive therapy for thyroid nodules. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2013;98:3949–3957.
crossref pmid
7. Mauri G, Cova L, Monaco CG, Sconfienza LM, Corbetta S, Benedini S, et al. Benign thyroid nodules treatment using percutaneous laser ablation (PLA) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA). Int J Hyperthermia 2017;33:295–299.
8. Pacella CM, Mauri G, Achille G, Barbaro D, Bizzarri G, De Feo P, et al. Outcomes and risk factors for complications of laser ablation for thyroid nodules: a multicenter study on 1531 patients. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2015;100:3903–3910.
crossref pmid
9. Kovatcheva RD, Vlahov JD, Stoinov JI, Zaletel K. Benign solid thyroid nodules: US-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound ablationinitial clinical outcomes. Radiology 2015;276:597–605.
crossref pmid
10. Lang BH, Woo YC, Wong CK. High-intensity focused ultrasound for treatment of symptomatic benign thyroid nodules: a prospective study. Radiology 2017;284:897–906.
crossref pmid
11. Trimboli P, Bini F, Marinozzi F, Baek JH, Giovanella L. High-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) therapy for benign thyroid nodules without anesthesia or sedation. Endocrine 2018;61:210–215.
crossref pmid pdf
12. Kremkau FW. Cancer therapy with ultrasound: a historical review. J Clin Ultrasound 1979;7:287–300.
crossref pmid
13. Barnard JW, Fry WJ, Fry FJ, Krumins RF. Effects of high intensity ultrasound on the central nervous system of the cat. J Comp Neurol 1955;103:459–484.
crossref pmid
14. Fry WJ, Barnard JW, Fry EJ, Krumins RF, Brennan JF. Ultrasonic lesions in the mammalian central nervous system. Science 1955;122:517–518.
15. Fry WJ, Barnard JW, Fry FJ, Brennan JF. Ultrasonically produced localized selective lesions in the central nervous system. Am J Phys Med 1955;34:413–423.
16. Fry WJ, Mosberg WH Jr, Barnard JW, Fry FJ. Production of focal destructive lesions in the central nervous system with ultrasound. J Neurosurg 1954;11:471–478.
crossref pmid
17. Wu F, Wang ZB, Chen WZ, Zou JZ, Bai J, Zhu H, et al. Advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: treatment with high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation combined with transcatheter arterial embolization. Radiology 2005;235:659–667.
crossref pmid
18. Wu F, Wang ZB, Chen WZ, Zhu H, Bai J, Zou JZ, et al. Extracorporeal high intensity focused ultrasound ablation in the treatment of patients with large hepatocellular carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 2004;11:1061–1069.
crossref pmid
19. Wu F, Wang ZB, Chen WZ, Wang W, Gui Y, Zhang M, et al. Extracorporeal high intensity focused ultrasound ablation in the treatment of 1038 patients with solid carcinomas in China: an overview. Ultrason Sonochem 2004;11:149–154.
crossref pmid
20. Wu F, Wang ZB, Chen WZ, Zou JZ, Bai J, Zhu H, et al. Extracorporeal focused ultrasound surgery for treatment of human solid carcinomas: early Chinese clinical experience. Ultrasound Med Biol 2004;30:245–260.
crossref pmid
21. Li CX, Xu GL, Jiang ZY, Li JJ, Luo GY, Shan HB, et al. Analysis of clinical effect of high-intensity focused ultrasound on liver cancer. World J Gastroenterol 2004;10:2201–2204.
crossref pmid pmc
22. Li YY, Sha WH, Zhou YJ, Nie YQ. Short and long term efficacy of high intensity focused ultrasound therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2007;22:2148–2154.
crossref pmid
23. Zhang L, Zhu H, Jin C, Zhou K, Li K, Su H, et al. High-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU): effective and safe therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma adjacent to major hepatic veins. Eur Radiol 2009;19:437–445.
crossref pmid
24. Hill CR, ter Haar GR. Review article: high intensity focused ultrasound: potential for cancer treatment. Br J Radiol 1995;68:1296–1303.
crossref pmid
25. Mearini L. High intensity focused ultrasound, liver disease and bridging therapy. World J Gastroenterol 2013;19:7494–7499.
crossref pmid pmc
26. Zhou YF. High intensity focused ultrasound in clinical tumor ablation. World J Clin Oncol 2011;2:8–27.
crossref pmid pmc
27. Lang BH, Woo YC, Chiu KW. Single-session high-intensity focused ultrasound treatment in large-sized benign thyroid nodules. Thyroid 2017;27:714–721.
crossref pmid
28. Lang BH, Wu AL. High intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) ablation of benign thyroid nodules: a systematic review. J Ther Ultrasound 2017;5:11.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
29. Lang BHH, Woo YC, Chiu KW. Vocal cord paresis following singlesession high intensity focused ablation (HIFU) treatment of benign thyroid nodules: incidence and risk factors. Int J Hyperthermia 2017;33:888–894.
30. Lang BHH, Woo YC, Chiu KW. Evaluation of pain during highintensity focused ultrasound ablation of benign thyroid nodules. Eur Radiol 2018;28:2620–2627.
crossref pmid pdf
31. Lang BHH, Woo YC, Chiu KW. High-intensity focused ablation (HIFU) of single benign thyroid nodule rarely alters underlying thyroid function. Int J Hyperthermia 2017;33:875–881.
crossref pmid
32. Lang BHH, Woo YC, Chiu KW. Two-year efficacy of single-session high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) ablation of benign thyroid nodules. Eur Radiol 2019;29:93–101.
crossref pmid pdf
33. Lim HK, Lee JH, Ha EJ, Sung JY, Kim JK, Baek JH. Radiofrequency ablation of benign non-functioning thyroid nodules: 4-year followup results for 111 patients. Eur Radiol 2013;23:1044–1049.
crossref pmid
34. Huh JY, Baek JH, Choi H, Kim JK, Lee JH. Symptomatic benign thyroid nodules: efficacy of additional radiofrequency ablation treatment session: prospective randomized study. Radiology 2012;263:909–916.
crossref pmid
35. Lang BH, Woo YC, Chiu KW. Role of second high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) treatment for unsatisfactory benign thyroid nodules after first treatment. Eur Radiol 2018 Aug 7 [Epub]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-018-5671-0.
crossref pdf
36. Lang BH, Woo YC, Wong IY, Chiu KW. Single-session high-intensity focused ultrasound treatment for persistent or relapsed Graves disease: preliminary experience in a prospective study. Radiology 2017;285:1011–1022.
crossref pmid
37. Lim HK, Baek JH, Lee JH, Kim WB, Kim TY, Shong YK, et al. Efficacy and safety of radiofrequency ablation for treating locoregional recurrence from papillary thyroid cancer. Eur Radiol 2015;25:163–170.
crossref pmid
38. Zhang M, Luo Y, Zhang Y, Tang J. Efficacy and safety of ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation for treating low-risk papillary thyroid microcarcinoma: a prospective study. Thyroid 2016;26:1581–1587.
crossref pmid
39. Lang BHH, Woo YC, Chiu KW. The percentage of serum thyroglobulin rise in the first-week did not predict the eventual success of high-intensity focussed ablation (HIFU) for benign thyroid nodules. Int J Hyperthermia 2017;33:882–887.
crossref pmid
40. Lang BHH, Woo YC, Chiu KW. Changes in serum thyroglobulin and antithyroglobulin shortly following high-intensity focused ablation of benign thyroid nodules in patients with positive antithyroglobulin status. Int J Hyperthermia 2018 Oct 10 [Epub]. https://doi.org/10.1080/02656736.2018.1516302.
41. Moyer LC, Timbie KF, Sheeran PS, Price RJ, Miller GW, Dayton PA. High-intensity focused ultrasound ablation enhancement in vivo via phase-shift nanodroplets compared to microbubbles. J Ther Ultrasound 2015;3:7.
crossref pmid pmc
42. Mauri G, Nicosia L, Xu Z, Di Pietro S, Monfardini L, Bonomo G, et al. Focused ultrasound: tumour ablation and its potential to enhance immunological therapy to cancer. Br J Radiol 2018;91:20170641.
crossref pmid pmc
43. Napoletano C, Taurino F, Biffoni M, De Majo A, Coscarella G, Bellati F, et al. RFA strongly modulates the immune system and antitumor immune responses in metastatic liver patients. Int J Oncol 2008;32:481–490.
44. Wu F. High intensity focused ultrasound ablation and antitumor immune response. J Acoust Soc Am 2013;134:1695–1701.
crossref pmid

The ultrasound-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound device that is commercially available.

The device comprises a generator, treatment head, computer, and screen.
Fig. 1.

The treatment screen captured immediately after an 8-second treatment pulse.

The presence of hyperechoic marks at the focal point indicates effective ablation at the ablated area.
Fig. 2.

Moderate shrinkage of a benign, isoechoic nodule taken from a 43-year-old woman before ablation and at 3-month and 6-month intervals after ablation.

The treated nodule appears more hypoechoic over time.
Fig. 3.
Editorial Office
A-304 Mapo Trapalace, 53 Mapo-daero, Mapo-gu, Seoul 04158, Korea
TEL : +82-2-763-5627   FAX : +82-2-763-6909   E-mail : office@ultrasound.or.kr
About |  Browse Articles |  Current Issue |  For Authors and Reviewers
Copyright © Korean Society of Ultrasound in Medicine. All rights reserved.                 powerd by m2community
Close layer
prev next