Semi-erect position for better visualization of subphrenic hepatocellular carcinoma during ultrasonography examination
Seong Eun Ko1, Min Woo Lee1,2, Hyo Keun Lim1,2, Ji Hye Min1, Dong Ik Cha1, Tae Wook Kang1,2, Kyoung Doo Song1,2, Min Ju Kim1, Hyunchul Rhim1,2
1Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
2Department of Health Sciences and Technology, SAIHST, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Korea
Corresponding Author: Min Woo Lee ,Tel: 82-2-3410-2548, Fax: 82-2-3410-0049, Email: leeminwoo0@gmail.com
Received: April 27, 2020;  Accepted: June 22, 2020.  Published online: June 22, 2020.
ABSTRACT
Purpose:
To evaluate which body position is more useful for visualization of subphrenic hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) during ultrasonography (US) examination.
Methods:
This prospective study was approved by the institutional review board and written informed consents were obtained from all patients. A total of 20 consecutive patients with a single subphrenic HCC (treatment-naïve, 1 to 3cm in size) underwent planning US examination for radiofrequency ablation. The examinations were done by one of three radiologists and the patients were examined under four different body positions: supine, right posterior oblique (RPO), left lateral decubitus (LLD) and semi-erect by being positioned on a tilted table. The visibility of the index tumor was prospectively assessed using a four-point scale. Needle insertion was considered to be technically-feasible if the visibility score was lower than 2. The visibility score and technical feasibility were compared by using Wilcoxon signed rank test and McNemar’s test, respectively, for a pairwise comparison between different body positions.
Results:
The visibility score was statistically lower in semi-erect position (median, 2; [IQR, 1–2.75]) when compared to supine position (3, 2–4), RPO position (3, 2–4) and LLD position (4, 3.25–4) (P=0.007, P=0.005, and P=0.001, respectively). Technical feasibility of needle insertion was also statistically higher in semi-erect position (75%, 15/20) when compared to supine position (45%, 9/45), RPO position (35%, 7/20), and LLD position (20%, 4/20) (P=0.031, P=0.021, and P=0.001, respectively).
Conclusion:
Semi-erect position is more useful for the visualization of subphrenic HCCs than supine, RPO or LLD positions.
Keywords: Liver; Ultrasound; Surveillance; Position; Hepatocellular carcinoma
TOOLS
METRICS
0
Crossref
65
View
5
Download
We recommend
Editorial Office
A-304 Mapo Trapalace, 53 Mapo-daero, Mapo-gu, Seoul 04158, Korea
TEL : +82-2-763-5627   FAX : +82-2-763-6909   E-mail : office@ultrasound.or.kr
About |  Browse Articles |  Current Issue |  For Authors and Reviewers
Copyright © Korean Society of Ultrasound in Medicine. All rights reserved.                 powerd by m2community
Close layer
prev next