Kim, Baek, Cho, and Sim: Long-term follow-up of the radiofrequency ablation of benign thyroid nodules: the value of additional treatment



This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of additional radiofrequency ablation (RFA) treatment for benign thyroid nodules.


Electronic medical records at a single institution from September 2008 to August 2016 were searched, and consecutive patients treated with RFA due to benign thyroid nodules with cosmetic or symptomatic problems were enrolled. All patients were followed up for at least 30 months. The nodules were divided into three groups: group 1 included nodules that met the criteria for additional treatment and underwent additional treatment, group 2 included nodules that met the criteria but did not undergo additional treatment, and group 3 included nodules that did not meet the criteria. The ablation results were compared among the three groups in terms of the initial ablation ratio (IAR) and volume reduction ratio (VRR).


Ninety nodules from 88 patients were included in the study. At the last follow-up, group 1 showed a significantly smaller nodule volume and larger VRR (2.5 mL and 84.6%, respectively) than group 2 (8.1 mL and 39.8%, respectively, P<0.001), but did not present a significant difference from group 3 (0.9 mL, P=0.347, and 92.8%, P=0.238). The IAR was significantly higher in group 3 (94.5%) than in the other two groups (group 1, 81.1%; group 2, 82.8%; P<0.001).


Multiple treatment sessions achieve greater VRR. Therefore, additional treatment could be considered for patients who meet the corresponding criteria.


Various studies have demonstrated that thermal ablation (TA) is an effective and safe treatment for benign thyroid nodules in patients with cosmetic problems or compressive symptoms [1-5]. However, several studies with long-term follow-up periods have shown that treated thyroid nodules can regrow after 2 to 3 years [6-8]. Even if regrowth occurs, some studies have suggested that a single treatment is sufficient because the primary purpose of TA is to improve compressive symptoms or cosmetic problems rather than to provide complete ablation [1,9]. At the same time, other studies have suggested that additional treatment is needed to achieve long-lasting effects without recurrence after TA [6]. With increasing awareness of the effectiveness and safety of TA, patients may choose a minimally invasive TA procedure to avoid scarring in the anterior neck area and to reduce the risk of surgical complications [10,11]. Therefore, to be considered as an alternative to surgery, TA procedures should be effective for the treatment of larger nodules, and the effects should be sustainable for longer periods [12].
Although there has been debate regarding the necessity of additional treatment, no study has investigated the efficacy of additional treatment. In addition, the proper timing and indications of additional treatment of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for benign thyroid nodules remain unclear. Therefore, the present study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of additional treatment.

Materials and Methods

Compliance with Ethical Standards

The national public institutional review board designated by the Korean Ministry of Health and Welfare approved this retrospective study (P01–202102-21–009), and the requirement for informed consent was waived because the patient data were evaluated retrospectively. However, all patients provided written informed consent for RFA.


Electronic medical records were searched from September 2008 to August 2016, and consecutive patients who were treated by ultrasonography (US)-guided RFA due to benign thyroid nodules were enrolled. The eligibility criteria for inclusion in this study were patients with benign thyroid nodules and cosmetic or symptomatic problems [13] and a follow-up period of at least 30 months after initial RFA. Nodules were divided into three groups according to whether they met the criteria for additional treatment and whether they underwent additional treatment. Group 1 included nodules that met the criteria for additional treatment and underwent additional treatment. Group 2 included nodules that met the criteria but did not undergo additional treatment. Group 3 included nodules that did not meet the criteria. The detailed criteria for additional treatment were as follows: (1) the patient’s symptoms or cosmetic problem had not been resolved or recurred; (2) regrowth or an increase in the viable volume (Vv) was observed; (3) the initial ablation ratio (IAR) was <70%; (4) increased vascularity with or without volume increase was observed. Both persistent vascularity and newly developed vascularity within nodules were included within the category of increased vascularity. The decision for additional treatment was made after discussion with each patient.
The following parameters were collected: age, sex, patients’ symptoms or cosmetic problems, the date of treatment, the initial nodule volume (mL), and the composition of the nodules at the initial examination.

Pre-ablation Assessment

A radiologist with 18 years of experience with thyroid imaging and US-guided procedures performed the US examinations, US-guided fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) or core needle biopsy (CNB), and RFA [14,15]. RFA was performed using high-frequency linear probes with real-time US machines (Accuvix XG or Accuvix V10, Samsung Medison, Seoul, Korea; E-cube 12, Alpinion Medical Systems, Seoul, Korea). The width and height of the nodule were measured on axial images. The length was measured on sagittal images. The volume of each nodule was calculated using the following equation: V (mL)=πabc/6 (V, volume; a, the largest diameter; b and c, the other two perpendicular diameters in centimeters) [16,17]. All nodules were confirmed to be benign by at least two instances of FNAC or CNB [13,18]. A scoring system was used to measure symptomatic or cosmetic problems. The patients reported a self-measured symptom score using a 10-cm visual analog scale (grade: 0-10) [4,19,20]. The cosmetic score was measured by a physician (1, no palpable mass; 2, no cosmetic problem but a palpable mass; 3, a cosmetic problem on swallowing only; and 4, a readily detected cosmetic problem) [1,4,19,20].


The same operator performed RFA using RF generators (RF150 and RF 300, Apro-Korea, Gunpo, Korea) and straight-type modified internally cooled electrodes with active tip lengths of 5, 7, 10, and 15 mm (Well-Point RF Electrode, STARmed, Goyang, Korea; CoATherm electrode, Apro-Korea). The techniques were performed as suggested by the Korean Society of Thyroid Radiology [13]. Patients were placed in the supine position with their necks fully extended. Under local anesthesia with 2% lidocaine, the transisthmic approach was used with the moving-shot technique. The hydrodissection technique was used to protect areas vulnerable to thermal injury, such as the danger triangle and around the carotid sheath. The venous ablation technique was used to fill the draining vein with bubbles generated by ablation, which was mainly located at the margin of the nodule [21]. When the dominant feeding artery was found, the artery-first ablation technique was used [21]. Complications during and immediately after the procedure were checked to ensure proper management [22]. After RFA, patients were observed for 4–6 hours in the hospital [23]. Each nodule received one to six sessions of treatment. The same techniques were used for additional treatments.


The same operator assessed volume changes and symptoms or cosmetic problems at 1, 3 or 6, and 12 months and additionally at 1-year intervals. Three types of nodule volume (total volume [Vt], ablated volume [Va], and Vv) were defined, measured, and calculated using US images. Vt was defined as the total nodule volume. Va was defined as the ablated nodule volume presenting as a hypoechoic area on US. Vv was defined as the incompletely treated viable nodule volume, which was calculated using the following equation: Vv=Vt-Va. The operator then assessed the IAR and volume reduction ratio (VRR) to evaluate the efficacy of the treatment. The IAR is the ratio of the Va to the Vt of the nodule immediately after RFA, which was calculated using the following equation [24]:
IAR(%)= Vtinitial-Vvfirst f/uVtinitial×100(%)
Vtintial is the total nodule volume immediately after RFA. It is practically interchangeable with the nodule volume before RFA. Vvfirst f/u can be calculated by the following formula; Vvfirst f/u=Vtfirst f/u-Vafirst f/u. Regrowth was defined as an increase in the Vt by more than 50% compared to the smallest Vt reported previously [6,25]. A Vv increase was defined as growth of the Vv by more than 50% compared to the smallest Vv reported previously [7].

Statistical Analysis

The statistical analysis was performed using SPSS for Windows version 20.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Data for continuous variables such as the patient’s age and nodule diameter and volume are presented as the mean and standard deviation. One-way analysis of variance and the Scheffé post-hoc test were used to determine the difference between the three groups classified according to whether they underwent additional treatment or showed regrowth. Values such as the initial volume and follow-up period were compared between groups. The IAR, VRR, and final Vt were compared to evaluate the results of RFA in each group. A P-value <0.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance.


After the exclusion of one nodule, 90 nodules in 88 patients were included in this study (male:female ratio=6:82; mean age, 39.2 years). One nodule was excluded because it was too large (extending under the clavicle), and the measurement was not accurate on the first US examination. Table 1 shows the demographics of the included patients and the characteristics of the nodules in this study. The mean follow-up period was 66.6 months after RFA (range, 33 to 122 months).
Overall, Vt and Vv began to increase after 3 years, and the increase was greater in Vv than in Vt. In contrast, Va showed a declining curve during the follow-up period, with the steepest decrease during the first year after RFA (Fig. 1). The mean VRR at the final follow-up was 81.2% (Table 2). The number of nodules with regrowth gradually increased during the follow-up period, whereas the highest number of nodules with Vv increase was in the first year. In the first 2 years, all three groups showed continuous volume reduction, but in group 2, regrowth occurred thereafter. In groups 1 and 3, volume reduction occurred until 4 years, but in group 3, there was slight regrowth. The final Vt of groups 1 and 3 was much smaller than that of group 2 (Fig. 2).
The initial volume of the nodules was significantly larger in group 1 (23.3 mL) than in group 3 (8.7 mL, P<0.001), while there was not a significant difference between groups 1 and 2 (14.1 mL, P=0.569) (Table 3, Fig. 2). The IAR was significantly higher in group 3 (94.5%) than in group 1 (81.1%, P<0.001) and group 2 (82.8%, P=0.003). At the last follow-up, group 1 showed significantly smaller mean nodule volume and higher VRR (2.5 mL and 84.6%, respectively) than group 2 (8.1 mL and 39.8%, respectively, P<0.001), but it did not show a significant difference from group 3 (0.9 mL, P=0.347 and 92.8%, P=0.238). The mean interval until the first additional treatment in group 1 was 37.6 months after the first RFA. The mean VRR at the time of first additional treatment was 52.2%, which was significantly lower than the mean VRR at the last follow-up (81.2%, P<0.001).
All three groups showed improvements in symptoms and cosmetic problems at the final follow-up compared to the initial score. However, aggravation of symptoms and cosmetic scores was observed in group 2 at 5 years after RFA, although there was no significant difference in the scores between the groups (Fig. 3).


This study demonstrated that the VRR was high when additional treatment was performed for nodules with regrowth, increased Vv, or symptom recurrence, while a single session of RFA was effective for initially small nodules without regrowth or symptom recurrence. The VRR was significantly lower in group 2 than in groups 1 and 3. The average initial nodule volume of group 2 was smaller than that of group 1 and the IAR was similar; however, the final Vt was significantly larger and the final VRR was lower than in group 1. These results demonstrated that additional treatment may be effective in achieving a high VRR in nodules with regrowth or increased Vv.
Additional treatment was also effective for the treatment of large nodules. Group 1 showed a high VRR at the final follow-up despite the large initial volume and lower IAR of those nodules, potentially reflecting the effect of additional RFA. However, considering that group 3 achieved a high VRR without additional RFA, unnecessary additional treatment should be avoided in nodules with a small initial volume and high IAR. Additional RFA should be limited to patients with large nodules, unresolved clinical problems, or nodules showing regrowth or increased Vv after the first RFA.
In the present study, a single treatment was sufficiently effective for small nodules without recurrence. Group 3 had a significantly higher IAR than the other two groups. As the IAR is correlated to the VRR at 1 year, the higher IAR may be one of the reasons for the absence of regrowth in group 3 [24,26].
The IAR is a value indicating how much nodule tissue was ablated during the RFA procedure, and it can be obtained using the simple formula: IAR (%)=Vainitial/Vtinitial×100 (%)). Here, "initial" denoted as a subscript means the time immediately after the RFA procedure (Fig. 4A). However, unfortunately, Vtinitial and Vainitial are practically difficult to measure on US immediately after the RFA because the images are not clear due to hemorrhage and edema (Fig. 4B). The exact value of Vtinitial is known, because it is the same value as the nodule volume before RFA. Therefore, in practice, Vtinitial and Vtbefore RFA can be used interchangeably. It is now only necessary to know Vainitial to calculate the IAR, for which an indirect method was used with the images from the first follow-up, usually conducted within 1 to 3 months (Fig. 4C). Since the images are clear at this time, measurements can be performed accurately (Fig. 4D). As shown by Fig. 4A and 4C, Vvinitial and Vvfirst f/u can be assumed to be equal. Because the period until the first follow-up is short, it is rare for the remaining viable tissue to grow after RFA. With the values of Vtinitial and Vvinitial in Fig. 4A, it is possible to calculate Vainitial and then the IAR, using the following equations:
IAR (%)=Vainitial/Vtinitial×100 (%) and then IAR (%)=(Vtinitial-Vvfirst f/u)/Vtinitial×100 (%)
Some authors have used other formulas ignoring the importance of the time point of measurement, such as Vvfirst f/u/Vtfirst f/u. However, it would be better to use Vtinitial instead of Vtfirst f/u because, the volume reduction between the initial measurements and the first follow-up could result in an error in the calculation [24,27].
There have been debates on the necessity of multiple treatments. Papini et al. [9] reported that a single session of laser ablation (LA) was effective and safe for solid nodules, achieving ≥50% VRR in 67% of patients. Huh et al. [28] reported that single-session RFA was effective in improving symptomatic and cosmetic problems in most patients, as it achieved a high VRR of 70.2%. However, based on the reported follow-up results over 3 years, regrowth issues have become evident in both RFA and LA [7,8,28-30]. As regrowth is the cause of recurrence of symptoms and cosmetic problems, researchers who regard TA as an alternative to surgery have attempted multiple treatments to obtain complete or near-complete ablation and minimize regrowth, with the ultimate aim of avoiding surgical intervention after TA. Although some researchers believe that multiple treatments have an unfavorable outcome [31], others have adopted a multiple-session treatment approach to achieve the maximum ablation effect [6]. Several well-known international guidelines have indicated that additional treatment is necessary [13,32,33].
Since short-term results do not guarantee long-lasting effects due to marginal regrowth, it is important to control regrowth to relieve compressive symptoms and cosmetic problems without recurrence. From this perspective, Sim and Baek [12] proposed that the ultimate clinical goal of the TA of benign thyroid nodules should be the "permanent avoidance of surgery." Additional treatment can help attain this goal by preventing regrowth and achieving a higher VRR.
The appropriate timing for additional treatment remains unclear to date. Predicting regrowth is important for determining the timing of additional treatment. Several studies have attempted to predict the regrowth of benign thyroid nodules after RFA. Sim et al. [7] and Yan et al. [34] found that Vv increase can be a predictive factor of regrowth. Vv increase occurred earlier and was greater than Vt increase in the present study. These results are consistent with those of the previous study by Sim et al. [7]. In the early period after RFA, Vv increase is masked by Va decrease. Vt increase, which indicates regrowth, occurs when the Vv increase exceeds the Va decrease. Therefore, regrowth may be detected earlier by monitoring Vv rather than Vt, which can help determine the appropriate timing of additional treatment.
In addition to the retrospective nature of this study, it has several limitations. First, this study was conducted with a relatively small number of patients from a single institution. These results should be validated in further prospective studies with a larger number of patients. Second, the characteristics of the nodules included in the study were not identical. As the vascularity and composition of nodules can affect the results of RFA [21,35-37], further well-designed studies are needed.
In conclusion, a greater VRR may be achieved by multiple-session RFA in large nodules. Therefore, additional treatment could be considered in the treatment of patients with unresolved clinical problems or nodules showing regrowth or increased Vv during follow-up after the first RFA.


Author Contributions

Conceptualization: Baek JH. Data acquisition: Sim JS, Cho W. Data analysis or interpretation: Kim HJ. Drafting of the manuscript: Kim HJ, Sim JS. Critical revision of the manuscript: Baek JH, Sim JS, Kim HJ. Approval of the final version of the manuscript: all authors.

Conflict of Interest

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.


1. Deandrea M, Limone P, Basso E, Mormile A, Ragazzoni F, Gamarra E, et al. US-guided percutaneous radiofrequency thermal ablation for the treatment of solid benign hyperfunctioning or compressive thyroid nodules. Ultrasound Med Biol 2008;34:784–791.
crossref pmid
2. Kim YS, Rhim H, Tae K, Park DW, Kim ST. Radiofrequency ablation of benign cold thyroid nodules: initial clinical experience. Thyroid 2006;16:361–367.
crossref pmid
3. Spiezia S, Garberoglio R, Milone F, Ramundo V, Caiazzo C, Assanti AP, et al. Thyroid nodules and related symptoms are stably controlled two years after radiofrequency thermal ablation. Thyroid 2009;19:219–225.
crossref pmid
4. Baek JH, Kim YS, Lee D, Huh JY, Lee JH. Benign predominantly solid thyroid nodules: prospective study of efficacy of sonographically guided radiofrequency ablation versus control condition. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010;194:1137–1142.
crossref pmid
5. Papini E, Guglielmi R, Bizzarri G, Graziano F, Bianchini A, Brufani C, et al. Treatment of benign cold thyroid nodules: a randomized clinical trial of percutaneous laser ablation versus levothyroxine therapy or follow-up. Thyroid 2007;17:229–235.
crossref pmid
6. Lim HK, Lee JH, Ha EJ, Sung JY, Kim JK, Baek JH. Radiofrequency ablation of benign non-functioning thyroid nodules: 4-year follow-up results for 111 patients. Eur Radiol 2013;23:1044–1049.
crossref pmid pdf
7. Sim JS, Baek JH, Lee J, Cho W, Jung SI. Radiofrequency ablation of benign thyroid nodules: depicting early sign of regrowth by calculating vital volume. Int J Hyperthermia 2017;33:905–910.
crossref pmid
8. Cho SJ, Baek JH, Chung SR, Choi YJ, Lee JH. Long-term results of thermal ablation of benign thyroid nodules: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Endocrinol Metab (Seoul) 2020;35:339–350.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
9. Papini E, Rago T, Gambelunghe G, Valcavi R, Bizzarri G, Vitti P, et al. Long-term efficacy of ultrasound-guided laser ablation for benign solid thyroid nodules: results of a three-year multicenter prospective randomized trial. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2014;99:3653–3659.
crossref pmid pdf
10. Bernardi S, Dobrinja C, Fabris B, Bazzocchi G, Sabato N, Ulcigrai V, et al. Radiofrequency ablation compared to surgery for the treatment of benign thyroid nodules. Int J Endocrinol 2014;2014:934595.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
11. Mauri G, Pacella CM, Papini E, Sconfienza LM, Solbiati L. Proceedings of the first Italian conference on thyroid minimally invasive treatments and foundation of the Italian research group for thyroid minimally invasive procedures. Int J Hyperthermia 2018;34:603–605.
crossref pmid
12. Sim JS, Baek JH. Unresolved clinical issues in thermal ablation of benign thyroid nodules: regrowth at long-term follow-up. Korean J Radiol 2021;22:1436–1440.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
13. Kim JH, Baek JH, Lim HK, Ahn HS, Baek SM, Choi YJ, et al. 2017 Thyroid radiofrequency ablation guideline: Korean Society of Thyroid Radiology. Korean J Radiol 2018;19:632–655.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
14. Lee YH, Baek JH, Jung SL, Kwak JY, Kim JH, Shin JH, et al. Ultrasoundguided fine needle aspiration of thyroid nodules: a consensus statement by the Korean Society of Thyroid Radiology. Korean J Radiol 2015;16:391–401.
crossref pmid pmc
15. Shin JH, Baek JH, Chung J, Ha EJ, Kim JH, Lee YH, et al. Ultrasonography diagnosis and imaging-based management of thyroid nodules: revised Korean Society of Thyroid Radiology consensus statement and recommendations. Korean J Radiol 2016;17:370–395.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
16. Ji Hong M, Baek JH, Choi YJ, Lee JH, Lim HK, Shong YK, et al. Radiofrequency ablation is a thyroid function-preserving treatment for patients with bilateral benign thyroid nodules. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2015;26:55–61.
crossref pmid
17. Ugurlu MU, Uprak K, Akpinar IN, Attaallah W, Yegen C, Gulluoglu BM. Radiofrequency ablation of benign symptomatic thyroid nodules: prospective safety and efficacy study. World J Surg 2015;39:961–968.
crossref pmid pdf
18. Lee HY, Baek JH, Ha EJ, Park JW, Lee JH, Song DE, et al. Malignant-looking thyroid nodules with size reduction: core needle biopsy results. Ultrasonography 2016;35:327–334.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
19. Jang SW, Baek JH, Kim JK, Sung JY, Choi H, Lim HK, et al. How to manage the patients with unsatisfactory results after ethanol ablation for thyroid nodules: role of radiofrequency ablation. Eur J Radiol 2012;81:905–910.
crossref pmid
20. Lee JH, Kim YS, Lee D, Choi H, Yoo H, Baek JH. Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of benign thyroid nodules in patients with incompletely resolved clinical problems after ethanol ablation (EA). World J Surg 2010;34:1488–1493.
crossref pmid pdf
21. Park HS, Baek JH, Park AW, Chung SR, Choi YJ, Lee JH. Thyroid radiofrequency ablation: updates on innovative devices and techniques. Korean J Radiol 2017;18:615–623.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
22. Baek JH, Lee JH, Sung JY, Bae JI, Kim KT, Sim J, et al. Complications encountered in the treatment of benign thyroid nodules with US-guided radiofrequency ablation: a multicenter study. Radiology 2012;262:335–342.
crossref pmid
23. Jeong WK, Baek JH, Rhim H, Kim YS, Kwak MS, Jeong HJ, et al. Radiofrequency ablation of benign thyroid nodules: safety and imaging follow-up in 236 patients. Eur Radiol 2008;18:1244–1250.
crossref pmid pdf
24. Sim JS, Baek JH, Cho W. Initial ablation ratio: quantitative value predicting the therapeutic success of thyroid radiofrequency ablation. Thyroid 2018;28:1443–1449.
crossref pmid
25. Moon WJ, Baek JH, Jung SL, Kim DW, Kim EK, Kim JY, et al. Ultrasonography and the ultrasound-based management of thyroid nodules: consensus statement and recommendations. Korean J Radiol 2011;12:1–14.
crossref pmid pmc
26. Bernardi S, Cavallaro M, Colombin G, Giudici F, Zuolo G, Zdjelar A, et al. Initial ablation ratio predicts volume reduction and retreatment after 5 years from radiofrequency ablation of benign thyroid nodules. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2020;11:582550.
crossref pmid pmc
27. Yan L, Luo Y, Xie F, Zhang M, Xiao J. Residual vital ratio: predicting regrowth after radiofrequency ablation for benign thyroid nodules. Int J Hyperthermia 2020;37:1139–1148.
crossref pmid
28. Huh JY, Baek JH, Choi H, Kim JK, Lee JH. Symptomatic benign thyroid nodules: efficacy of additional radiofrequency ablation treatment session--prospective randomized study. Radiology 2012;263:909–916.
crossref pmid
29. Dossing H, Bennedbaek FN, Hegedus L. Long-term outcome following interstitial laser photocoagulation of benign cold thyroid nodules. Eur J Endocrinol 2011;165:123–128.
crossref pmid
30. Negro R, Greco G, Deandrea M, Rucco M, Trimboli P. Twelve-month volume reduction ratio predicts regrowth and time to regrowth in thyroid nodules submitted to laser ablation: a 5-year follow-up retrospective study. Korean J Radiol 2020;21:764–772.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
31. Negro R, Greco G. Unfavorable outcomes in solid and spongiform thyroid nodules treated with laser ablation: a 5-year follow-up retrospective study. Endocr Metab Immune Disord Drug Targets 2019;19:1041–1045.
crossref pmid pmc
32. Papini E, Pacella CM, Solbiati LA, Achille G, Barbaro D, Bernardi S, et al. Minimally-invasive treatments for benign thyroid nodules: a Delphi-based consensus statement from the Italian minimally-invasive treatments of the thyroid (MITT) group. Int J Hyperthermia 2019;36:376–382.
crossref pmid pdf
33. Ha EJ, Baek JH, Che Y, Chou YH, Fukunari N, Kim JH, et al. Radiofrequency ablation of benign thyroid nodules: recommendations from the Asian Conference on Tumor Ablation Task Force - secondary publication. J Med Ultrasound 2021;29:77–83.
crossref pmid pmc
34. Yan L, Luo Y, Zhang M, Xiao J. Vital volume increase versus clinical evaluation as the indication of additional radiofrequency ablation for benign thyroid nodule: a single center retrospective study. Int J Hyperthermia 2020;37:777–785.
crossref pmid
35. Lee GM, You JY, Kim HY, Chai YJ, Kim HK, Dionigi G, et al. Successful radiofrequency ablation strategies for benign thyroid nodules. Endocrine 2019;64:316–321.
crossref pmid pdf
36. Offi C, Garberoglio S, Antonelli G, Esposito MG, Brancaccio U, Misso C, et al. The ablation of thyroid nodule's afferent arteries before radiofrequency ablation: preliminary data. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2020;11:565000.
crossref pmid pmc
37. Baek JH. Factors related to the efficacy of radiofrequency ablation for benign thyroid nodules. Ultrasonography 2017;36:385–386.
crossref pmid pmc pdf

Diagram showing changes in the Vt, Va, and Vv.

Here, initial means the status immediately after RFA. Va shows a decreasing pattern during the follow-up period, and the slope is steep during the first year and there is little change in the slope thereafter. Vt shows a decreasing pattern until about 3 years and shows a slight increase afterward. Vv is relatively stable up to 3 years. However, it increases slightly thereafter. Vt, total volume; Va, ablated volume; Vv, viable volume; RFA, radiofrequency ablation.
Fig. 1.

Diagram showing changes in Vt according to the groups.

Group 1 show declining curve during follow-up period, while group 2 show a volume increase 2 years after RFA. Group 3 show a declining curve during 4 years, but its volume increased slightly at 5 years. Vt, total volume; RFA, radiofrequency ablation.
Fig. 2.

Symptom score and cosmetic score in the three groups during follow-up.

All three groups show improvement in symptoms and cosmetic problems at the final follow-up compared to the initial score. However, group 2 show aggravation in symptom and cosmetic score at 5 years after radiofrequency ablation.
Fig. 3.

Diagram and US images immediately after RFA and at the first follow-up.

Diagram (A) and US image (B) show a nodule immediately after RFA. As there is marked swelling due to the hemorrhage and edema, an accurate measurement of both Vtinitial and Vainitial is not possible. Diagram (C) and US image (D) show the nodule at the first follow-up. The swelling has been absorbed and measurements can be made accurately. The arrows and arrowheads in D indicate the deeper margins of Vt and Va, respectively. IAR, initial ablation ratio; RFA, radiofrequency ablation; US, ultrasonography; Va, ablated volume; Vt, total volume; Vv, viable volume.
Fig. 4.
Table 1.
Patients’ demographic data and characteristics of the nodules
Variable Value
No. of patients 88
Sex (male:female) 6:82
Age (year) 39.2±11.4
No. of nodules 90
Nodule diameter, longest (cm) 3.7±1.2 (0.9‒7.7)
Nodule volume (mL) 14.3±16.2 (1.5‒90.1)
 Solid or predominantly solid 80
 Cystic or predominantly cystic 10
No. of RFA sessions (range) 1.5±0.9 (1‒6)
F/U period (month) (range) 66.6±23.2 (33‒122)

Values are presented as mean±SD (range).

RFA, radiofrequency ablation; F/U, follow-up.

a) Solid: no obvious cystic component; predominantly solid: cystic portion ≤50%; predominantly cystic: cystic portion >50%; cystic: no obvious solid component.

Table 2.
Nodule volume changes according to the follow-up period
Variable Index 1 year 2 years 3 years 4 years 5 years Final
No. of nodules 90 64 55 47 40 38 90
Vt 14.3 3.8 2.9 2.4 2.7 3.6 2.6
Va - 1.5 1.2 1.3 0.7 0.6 0.6
Vv - 2.3 1.8 1.1 2.0 3.0 2.6
VRR (%) - 76.6 84.1 85.4 87.4 74.5 81.2
No. of cases with Vv increase (%) - 11 (17.2) 8 (14.5) 5 (10.6) 4 (10.0) 8 (21.1) 40 (44.4)a)
No. of cases with regrowth (%) - 1 (1.6) 4 (7.3) 4 (8.5) 2 (5.0) 8 (21.1) 25 (27.8)b)
No. of RFA sessions - 1.1 1.2 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5c)

Vt, total volume; Va, ablated volume; Vv, viable volume; VRR, volume reduction rate; RFA, radiofrequency ablation.

a) The cumulative number of nodules that showed more than a 50% increase in viable volume.

b) The cumulative number of nodules that showed more than a 50% increase in total volume.

c) The cumulative number of RFA sessions during follow-up.

Table 3.
Final volume reduction rate according to group
1 2 3
No. 29 15 46
Initial volume, mean±SD (range) (mL) 23.3±21.5 (1.5‒90.1) 14.1±13.4 (1.7‒56.0) 8.7±9.5a) (1.6‒61.8)
IAR (%) 81.1 82.8 94.5a)
Session 2.6a) (2-6) 1 1
F/U (month) 68.5 64.9 65.9
Final Vt 2.5±2.9 8.1±8.1a) 0.9±2.6
VRR 84.6±19.0 39.8±43.5a) 92.8±10.0
No. of cases with Vv increaseb) 25 15 0
No. of cases with regrowthc) 15 10 0

SD, standard deviation; IAR, initial ablation ratio; F/U, follow-up period; Vt, total volume; VRR, volume reduction rate; Vv, viable volume.

a) Significantly different between the indicated group and the other two groups.

b) The number of nodules that showed a Vv increase by more than 50% compared to the previously reported smallest Vv.

c) The number of nodules that showed a Vt increase by more than 50% compared to the previously reported smallest Vt.

Web of Science
We recommend
Editorial Office
A-304 Mapo Trapalace, 53 Mapo-daero, Mapo-gu, Seoul 04158, Korea
TEL : +82-2-763-5627   FAX : +82-2-763-6909   E-mail :
About |  Browse Articles |  Current Issue |  For Authors and Reviewers
Copyright © Korean Society of Ultrasound in Medicine.                 Developed in M2PI
Zoom in Close layer