Erratum: Noninvasive assessment of hepatic steatosis using a pathologic reference standard: comparison of CT, MRI, and US-based techniques

Jae Seok Bae; Dong Ho Lee; Kyung-Suk Suh; Haeryoung Kim; Kyung Bun Lee; Jae Young Lee; Joon Koo Han

doi:10.14366/usg.21150.ER

Search: Ultrasonography Search

CLOSE

Ultrasonography > Volume 42(2); 2023 > Article

Bae, Lee, Suh, Kim, Lee, Lee, and Han: Erratum: Noninvasive assessment of hepatic steatosis using a pathologic reference standard: comparison of CT, MRI, and US-based techniques

Erratum

Ultrasonography 2023; 42(2): 356-356. https://doi.org/10.14366/usg.21150.ER

Erratum: Noninvasive assessment of hepatic steatosis using a pathologic reference standard: comparison of CT, MRI, and US-based techniques

Jae Seok Bae^1,², Dong Ho Lee^1,², Kyung-Suk Suh³, Haeryoung Kim⁴, Kyung Bun Lee⁴, Jae Young Lee^1,^2,⁵, Joon Koo Han^1,^2,⁵

¹Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea

²Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea

³Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea

⁴Department of Pathology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea

⁵Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University Medical Research Center, Seoul, Korea

Published online March 29, 2023

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

This corrects the article "Noninvasive assessment of hepatic steatosis using a pathologic reference standard: comparison of CT, MRI, and US-based techniques" on page 344.

Ultrasonography 2022;41:344-354

https://doi.org/10.14366/usg.21150

The authors and publisher of the article would like to bring the reader’s attention to an error in Table 2 on page 350.

The ATI data for ‘Diagnostic performance of imaging tools for detecting HS ≥5%’ is incorrect and should be revised. Please see the corrected Table 2 below for the accurate data.

Table 2.

Diagnostic performance of imaging tools for detecting HS ≥5%

Values are percentages, with numerators and denominators in parentheses and 95% confidence intervals in brackets.

HS, hepatic steatosis; AUC, area under the curve; PPV, positive predictive value; NPV, negative predictive value; CT, computed tomography; MRI-PDFF, magnetic resonance imaging-derived proton density fat fraction; CAP, controlled attenuation parameter; US, ultrasound; ATI, attenuation imaging.

TOOLS

Download Citation

Cited Download

export Copy Format

Close

PDF Links

PubReader

ePub Link

XML Download

Full text via DOI

METRICS

Web of Science

Crossref

Scopus

2,038

View

Download

Editorial Office
A-304 Mapo Trapalace, 53 Mapo-daero, Mapo-gu, Seoul 04158, Korea
TEL : +82-2-763-5627 FAX : +82-2-763-6909 E-mail : office@ultrasound.or.kr

About | Browse Articles | Current Issue | For Authors and Reviewers