Ultrasonography Search

CLOSE

Ultrasonography > Volume 43(5); 2024 > Article
Cho, Chai, Kim, Kim, and Seo: Ultrasonographic differential diagnosis of medial elbow pain

Abstract

Medial elbow pain is a common musculoskeletal problem among individuals engaging in repetitive activities. Medial epicondylitis is the predominant cause of this pain. However, other potential causes must be considered as part of the differential diagnosis. This article discusses several etiologies of medial elbow pain, including medial epicondylitis, ulnar neuropathy, snapping triceps syndrome, ulnar collateral ligament injury, medial antebrachial cutaneous neuropathy, and diseases of the elbow joint, with an emphasis on ultrasound (US) findings. Awareness of possible diagnoses and their US features can assist radiologists in establishing a comprehensive diagnosis for medial elbow pain.

Introduction

Medial elbow pain is a musculoskeletal issue that is frequently encountered in individuals engaged in repetitive activities, although it is less prevalent than lateral elbow pain [1,2]. Medial epicondylitis, a pathological condition involving the common flexor tendon, is recognized as the most common cause of medial elbow pain. However, other anatomical structures within the medial elbow region can also contribute to the pain, and these should be considered in the differential diagnosis. Such structures include the ulnar nerve, the medial head of the triceps, the ulnar collateral ligament (UCL), the medial antebrachial cutaneous nerve (MACN), and the elbow joint.
Ultrasonography (US) plays a key role in identifying the causes of medial elbow pain due to the superficial location of potential pain sources. Additionally, US represents a practical tool for screening other structures that may harbor coexisting pathologies or represent alternative diagnoses, even when positive findings are already apparent in one structure. Moreover, US offers the benefit of dynamic evaluation, which is essential for assessing the instability of a structure or joint laxity. Alongside US, incorporating the patient’s characteristic history, symptoms, and physical examination findings aids in refining potential diagnoses and conducting a more targeted US assessment. Table 1 presents common causes of medial elbow pain, their clinical features, and checklists for US evaluation.
This review article will discuss several etiologies of medial elbow pain, including medial epicondylitis, ulnar entrapment neuropathy, ulnar nerve instability, snapping triceps syndrome, UCL injury, MACN neuropathy, and elbow joint diseases, with a focus on US findings. Familiarity with potential diagnoses and their US features can assist radiologists in formulating a comprehensive diagnosis for medial elbow pain.

Scanning Technique

US examination of the medial elbow can be performed with the patient either seated or lying in the supine position on an examination table (Fig. 1). For a more expedient setup, the patient should sit facing the examiner and rest their arm on a table or pillow, with the elbow in external rotation and either extended or slightly flexed [3]. This seated arrangement also facilitates immediate comparison between sides. Alternatively, the supine position, with the arm extended, abducted, and externally rotated, provides greater comfort when assessing the medial elbow’s supporting structures, along with the ulnar nerve, the anterior band of the UCL, and their respective stabilities [4].
US examination of the medial elbow is typically initiated in the long axis. The cranial end of the transducer is positioned over the medial epicondyle, which is identifiable either by palpation or visual inspection. Subsequently, a coronal view can display the characteristic hyperechoic bony contour of the medial epicondyle and ulnotrochlear articulation [5]. In this longitudinal scan, the common flexor tendon and the anterior band of the UCL can be identified (Fig. 2). At its origin on the medial epicondyle, the common flexor tendon exhibits a hyperechoic and fibrillar pattern, which transitions to a hypoechoic musculature distally [6]. The anterior band of the UCL, located deep to the common flexor tendon, also displays a fibrillar structure but with more compact hyperechogenicity than the tendon. It extends from the medial epicondyle to the sublime tubercle of the ulna [6]. Additional assessment of these structures can be performed in the transverse plane, or short axis.
A slight external rotation of the arm facilitates the evaluation of the posteromedial elbow, including the ulnar nerve and cubital tunnel. The cubital tunnel is a fibro-osseous channel that lies between the medial epicondyle and the olecranon. This structure is covered by the cubital tunnel retinaculum, with the posterior band of the UCL forming its floor [7]. By positioning the transducer transversely at the posteromedial elbow to simultaneously visualize the medial epicondyle and the olecranon, the cubital tunnel and ulnar nerve can be assessed in the short axis (transverse view). The ulnar nerve typically exists within the cubital tunnel and is identifiable by its characteristic fascicular appearance, which includes hypoechoic neural bundles (Fig. 3) [6-8].
The dynamic evaluation of the medial elbow is described in the following sections.

Medial Epicondylitis

Medial epicondylitis, commonly known as "golfer’s elbow," is a frequent source of medial elbow pain [2]. Patients may present with a history of repetitive actions that entail valgus stress and flexion of the elbow, involve wrist flexion and pronation, or are associated with activities such as golf, overhead throwing, and racket sports [2,9,10]. Chronic overuse and repetitive microtears to the common flexor tendon result in tendon degeneration and angiofibroblastic changes, which in turn can lead to tendinosis and tearing [10]. Typical symptoms include medial elbow pain, often with an insidious onset and sometimes accompanied by grip strength weakness [2]. The most tender point is usually found 5 to 10 mm distal and anterior to the medial epicondyle, and pain is elicited during resisted wrist flexion and forearm pronation [10].
US is considered a practical and accurate modality for detecting medial epicondylitis, exhibiting good diagnostic performance with a sensitivity of 95.2%, specificity of 92%, and an accuracy of 93.5% [11]. On the long-axis view in the coronal plane, the normal tendon appears as a continuous band of longitudinal fibers with uniform high echogenicity, extending distally to the myotendinous junction and the hypoechoic musculature. US findings characteristic of medial epicondylitis include tendinosis features such as focal or diffuse hypoechoic changes, heterogeneous echotexture, and tendon swelling, as well as outward bowing, ill-defined margins, or subjacent fluid collection (Fig. 4) [4,10-12]. Intratendinous hyperechoic calcifications, adjacent entheseal irregularity, or traction spurs may also be present and can be confirmed on elbow radiographs, which supports the diagnosis [6,13,14]. The calcifications found in degenerated tendons are typically dystrophic, characterized by well-defined margins, a solid appearance, and strong posterior acoustic shadowing. This contrasts with the amorphous, nodular, punctate, and even cystic calcific deposits seen in calcific tendinitis, which exhibit variable posterior acoustic shadowing (Fig. 5) [15]. Neovascularization of the tendon, which can be detected using color or power Doppler US, varies and is more commonly observed in patients with a longer duration of symptoms [11]. When performing a Doppler examination, it is important not to apply excessive pressure with the probe, as the vessels in the pathological tendon are compressible and can be easily collapsed by probe pressure, which may result in missed detection of abnormal vascularity on Doppler US [16]. A partial-thickness tear is indicated by an anechoic cleft or incomplete fiber discontinuity. Although rare in medial epicondylitis, a full-thickness tear is characterized by complete discontinuity and retraction of the tendon, if present [6].
Medial epicondylitis often coexists with other pathologies, including ulnar neuropathy and UCL injury. Up to 60% of patients with medial epicondylitis experience concomitant ulnar neuropathy [17-20], which is associated with increased pain and worse surgical outcomes [18,21]. In these cases, the surgical approach for ulnar neuropathy may need to be adjusted, as anterior transposition of the nerve might be preferable to an isolated release of the cubital tunnel. This helps prevent the nerve from remaining in the inflammatory bed after surgery. Consequently, when medial epicondylitis is diagnosed using US, other medial elbow structures should also be examined.

Ulnar Neuropathy

Ulnar neuropathy at the elbow, also known as cubital tunnel syndrome, is the second most common compressive neuropathy affecting the upper extremity [2]. Although it was first introduced as ulnar entrapment neuropathy at the fibro-osseous passageway between the medial epicondyle and the olecranon, the term 'cubital tunnel syndrome' is now more commonly used to describe a wide range of conditions, encompassing ulnar nerve compression, neuropathy, or neuritis anywhere around the elbow [22,23].
Ulnar neuropathy typically results in paresthesia or numbness in the fourth and fifth digits, and patients may also experience elbow pain that radiates to the forearm and hand [24]. As the disease progresses to more severe stages, motor nerve impairment can develop, leading to weakness in the intrinsic hand muscles. This may manifest as an inability to adduct the fifth finger, known as the Wartenberg sign, or as a claw-hand deformity that primarily affects the fourth and fifth fingers [2,24-26].
Ulnar neuropathy or neuritis can develop due to compression or irritation of the nerve. This irritation may stem from nerve instability or the spread of local inflammation at the elbow, such as that seen with medial epicondylitis. Additionally, the superficial location of the ulnar nerve and its proximity to the bone make it particularly susceptible to traumatic injury [27]. Clinicians must be well-informed about these conditions, as the treatment approach for each can vary. This article will discuss the two main entities of ulnar nerve entrapment and instability, while also addressing snapping triceps syndrome, a similar pathology associated with ulnar nerve instability.

Ulnar Nerve Entrapment

Several anatomical sites around the elbow are vulnerable to ulnar nerve compression. From proximal to distal, these include the intermuscular septum, encompassing the arcade of Struthers; the medial epicondyle at the entrance of the cubital tunnel; the area within the cubital tunnel; and the region between the two heads of the flexor carpi ulnaris, below the Osborne band (fascia) (Fig. 6) [7,28,29]. Of these, the cubital tunnel is the most frequent site of ulnar nerve compression [7,28].
The thickened cubital tunnel retinaculum or a shallow epicondylar groove can limit the space available for the ulnar nerve within the cubital tunnel. Additionally, space-occupying soft tissue lesions, such as anatomic variants including anconeus epitrochlearis, ganglion cysts, or various types of tumors, may contribute to ulnar nerve compression in cubital tunnel syndrome [30,31]. Osseous abnormalities of the elbow joint, such as those resulting from trauma, surgery, arthritis, osteophytes, and cubitus valgus, may also compress the nerve or disrupt its course [4,32,33].
The normal nerve on US typically exhibits a characteristic fascicular pattern, consisting of hypoechoic neural bundles with hyperechoic interfaces. However, at the cubital tunnel, the ulnar nerve frequently presents as entirely hypoechoic and lacking discrete fascicles, even when not pathological [34]. Consequently, the absence of a fascicular pattern should not be solely relied upon as evidence of ulnar neuropathy on US.
In contrast, the pathological nerve tends to be substantially enlarged in addition to the less fascicular appearance [6,8,35]. Swelling is often segmental and located proximal to the site of compression, sometimes accompanied by an abrupt change in caliber [4,8]. The size of the ulnar nerve is usually assessed at the proximal cubital tunnel using the cross-sectional area (CSA) (Fig. 7). Since the CSA may decrease when the elbow is flexed compared to when it is extended, measurements should be taken with the elbow extended [4,27,36]. In the previous literature, the cut-off value of the CSA indicating abnormal findings ranges from 7.5 to 10 mm2 [37-39]. A recent meta-analysis recommends a threshold of 10 mm2 for diagnosing cubital tunnel syndrome. This recommendation is based on the observation that the CSA of the ulnar nerve at various elbow locations rarely exceeds 10 mm2 in the healthy population. Additionally, the sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic odds ratio values pooled from five studies using this cut-off were 85%, 91%, and 53.96, respectively [39]. Considering sex-related differences in normal nerve size [34,40], a side-to-side comparison may offer additional diagnostic value in borderline cases.
Some studies have examined the differences in CSA values measured at the cubital tunnel compared to other locations. This approach may be particularly beneficial for evaluating patients with diffuse nerve enlargement due to obesity or polyneuropathy. Yoon et al. [41] proposed a diagnostic criterion based on a ratio of 1.5:1, comparing the CSA at the site of maximal swelling around the elbow to that of the nerve either proximally or distally. This criterion demonstrated a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 96.7% [41].

Ulnar Nerve Instability

Ulnar nerve instability is another cause of chronic ulnar neuropathy. An unstable ulnar nerve exhibits transient medial displacement from the cubital tunnel over the medial epicondyle when the elbow is flexed, then returns to its original position during elbow extension. This repetitive movement of the nerve can lead to damage and induce friction neuritis [42]. Patients may experience a snapping sensation over the medial epicondyle during elbow flexion and extension. Several factors can contribute to ulnar nerve instability, including congenital partial or complete absence of the cubital tunnel retinaculum, hypertrophic triceps muscles, or a shallow groove [43-46].
US is a unique imaging modality that enables the visualization of the real-time dynamic movement of the ulnar nerve. To observe this movement, the US probe should be positioned transversely over the medial epicondyle, taking care not to apply excessive pressure, which can inhibit nerve movement. Slow flexing of the elbow while monitoring the US can reveal the transient movement of the nerve (Fig. 8, Video clip 1). If capturing the nerve’s movement in real time proves challenging, instability can still be assessed by determining whether the nerve remains within the cubital tunnel after elbow flexion. The extent of ulnar nerve displacement during elbow flexion can be classified as either subluxation, where the nerve is displaced over the apex of the medial epicondyle but does not move further upon full flexion, or dislocation, where the nerve shifts medially and moves completely past the medial epicondyle (Fig. 8) [47].
However, ulnar nerve instability does not invariably lead to ulnar neuropathy. Studies have indicated that ulnar nerve instability can be found in up to 20%-49% of the asymptomatic healthy population [6,47]; as such, it is considered a normal variant. Consequently, the diagnosis of ulnar neuropathy should be approached with caution in asymptomatic patients.

Snapping Triceps Syndrome

Snapping triceps syndrome is a pathological condition that causes irritation and instability of the ulnar nerve due to medial subluxation of the triceps muscle during elbow flexion. Patients may experience medial elbow pain, a snapping sensation, and/or symptoms of ulnar neuropathy [48,49]. Characteristic features include two distinct snaps on the medial elbow, often palpable, with the first corresponding to the dislocation of the ulnar nerve and the second to the subluxation of the triceps muscle [48,50]. Snapping triceps syndrome tends to affect men, manual laborers, athletes, and individuals with varus elbow deformity [51]. Several predisposing factors have been identified, including varus malalignment of the humerus, hypoplastic medial epicondyle, hypertrophic distal triceps muscle, and accessory slips of the triceps muscle [49,52,53].
Subluxation of the medial head of the triceps muscle can be observed crossing over the apex of the medial epicondyle during elbow flexion, along with the ulnar nerve (Fig. 9). Dynamic US of the medial elbow is advantageous for visually capturing the snapping triceps and concomitant ulnar nerve dislocation in real time (Video clip 2) [50]. The snapping sensation may be conveyed through the transducer. However, accompanying structural changes in the ulnar nerve, such as increased CSA, may not be apparent on US even in patients with ulnar nerve symptoms [50].

UCL Injury

The UCL, also known as the medial collateral ligament of the elbow, is a critical stabilizer of the elbow joint, comprising anterior, posterior, and transverse bands. The anterior band of the UCL serves as the primary restraint against valgus stress on the elbow and is the focal point for assessing ligament injuries using US [54]. UCL injuries are particularly prevalent among overhead athletes, especially baseball pitchers, but they also affect participants in football, tennis, golf, and various other sports [55,56]. Overhead throwing activities subject the elbow to considerable valgus stress. This repetitive stress, combined with inadequate muscle stabilization, can result in ligament damage and subsequent valgus instability of the elbow [55,57,58]. Patients may experience chronic medial elbow pain during the late cocking and early acceleration phases of throwing. Alternatively, in the case of an acute injury, they may describe a sudden popping sensation followed by immediate pain and an inability to continue throwing [1,2].
The anterior band of the UCL originates from the inferior surface of the medial epicondyle, beneath the common flexor tendon, and extends to the sublime tubercle of the ulna. On US, it appears compact, hyperechoic, and fibrillar with a fan-like or cord-like structure. Applying valgus stress to the elbow can improve the visualization of the anterior band of the UCL, as the fibers tighten and become homogenously visible from the proximal to distal ends with the reduction of anisotropy. Partial tears of the anterior band of the UCL are characterized by hypoechoic changes, thickening, or focal anechoic defects involving discontinuity of the ligament. In cases of remote ligament injuries, intact fibers may appear lax. In skeletally immature adolescents, avulsion bone fragments from the medial epicondyle may be present. Complete tears of the ligament are indicated by the non-visualization or focal complete discontinuity of the fibers, accompanied by surrounding fluid or hemorrhage of variable echogenicity [4,6,59].
Dynamic US with valgus stress applied to the elbow joint can be used to demonstrate joint space widening, indicative of ligamentous laxity. To apply valgus stress to the elbow, the examiner externally rotates the shoulder while the arm is abducted and the elbow is flexed. Normally, the medial elbow joint space opens less than 3 mm with a firm endpoint [2,60]. However, abnormal medial joint space widening can be observed under valgus stress in the presence of a UCL injury (Fig. 10). The recommended diagnostic criterion is a change in joint space exceeding 1 mm between unstressed and stressed conditions, with a sensitivity of 96% and specificity of 81% according to previous research [61,62]. Nonetheless, a caveat exists when diagnosing a UCL injury based solely on widened joint space; asymptomatic professional athletes may exhibit a joint space gap of up to 3-4 mm or display asymmetry between their throwing and non-throwing arms [63].

Medial Antebrachial Cutaneous Neuropathy

The MACN is a purely sensory nerve that provides cutaneous sensation to the medial forearm. It originates from the medial cord of the brachial plexus and runs medially and posteriorly to the axillary artery before piercing the deep fascia in conjunction with the basilic vein, with which it runs distally. The MACN typically divides into anterior and posterior branches at the mid-arm level [64,65]. Accordingly, the nerve can be identified on US by following the basilic vein and positioning the probe medial to the biceps brachii muscle in the subcutaneous tissue at the anteromedial elbow (Fig. 11) [66]. MACN injury is most commonly caused by iatrogenic events, including complications from venous puncture, injection for medial epicondylitis, and cubital tunnel release [66]. Patients generally present with pain and numbness over the medial elbow and forearm. While the nerve may not display overt changes on US, a positive Tinel sign elicited by compressing the probe over the nerve can aid in diagnosis [66]. Additionally, reports describe symptomatic snapping of the MACN over the medial epicondyle during elbow flexion and extension [66,67]. Consequently, dynamic US of the MACN should be considered in cases of suspected neuropathy.

Arthritis

Various etiologies of arthritis that affect the elbow joint can lead to medial elbow pain. Reviewing plain radiographs and the clinical history of patients prior to US examination can assist in forming an impression of the arthritic condition.
Primary osteoarthritis of the elbow joint is less common than post-traumatic arthritis and predominantly affects the ulnohumeral joint. The degenerative changes and osteophytes initially impact the tips of the olecranon and coronoid process, with the articular cartilage becoming involved in more advanced stages [68]. This leads to pain and a limited range of motion in elbow flexion and extension. Although it is challenging to directly identify narrowed joint spaces or cartilage lesions, US can detect the presence of osteophytes and intra-articular bodies, which can cause irritation and pain or may be accompanied by effusion [69]. A dynamic examination involving flexion and extension of the elbow may help to mobilize joint fluid and intra-articular bodies, thus differentiating loose bodies from fixed osteophytes [8]. Additionally, the examiner should assess for ulnar neuropathy, which can occur in patients with osteoarthritis due to nerve irritation or compression from osteophytes or ganglions near the cubital tunnel [70,71].
Inflammatory or crystal-induced arthritis can also involve the elbow joint, presenting with joint effusion, synovial hypertrophy, and destructive bone abnormalities. The posterior olecranon recess, when the elbow is flexed, is the most sensitive area for detecting small effusions. Here, US in the longitudinal plane can reveal the displacement of the hyperechoic fat pad due to joint distension [72]. A larger effusion can distend the coronoid and radial fossa in the anterior elbow. Unlike simple anechoic effusions, complex effusions may vary in echogenicity and are often challenging to differentiate from synovial hypertrophy. Compared to synovial hypertrophy, complex effusions exhibit compressibility of the recess, redistribution or movement of contents when pressure is applied, and an absence of blood flow on Doppler US [6]. Synovial hypertrophy associated with rheumatoid arthritis or other forms of inflammatory arthritis may display diffuse synovial proliferation, which is typically less echogenic than subcutaneous fat, as well as synovial hyperemia and joint distension (Fig. 12) [6]. Cortical irregularities and disruptions, often seen with synovitis, can indicate adjacent bone erosions due to inflammation [6,8]. In diseases characterized by crystal deposition, such as gout or pseudogout, hyperechoic foci of mineral deposition may be observed within the joint or periarticular soft tissue. Furthermore, olecranon bursitis, which is commonly associated with gout or rheumatoid arthritis, presents as a distended bursa with effusion and synovial proliferation.
Medial elbow pain has numerous potential causes beyond those previously discussed, such as lymphoproliferative disease (Fig. 13), occult tumors, and more. Without an active search for the underlying pathology, the true source of pain may be easily overlooked during US examination. Consequently, it is crucial for radiologists to scan the area of greatest pain to ensure that US is used for the efficient and thorough assessment of medial elbow pain.

Conclusion

In the evaluation of medial elbow pain, US provides an efficient and dynamic assessment of the medial elbow structures. Correlating characteristic clinical features can improve the accuracy of US by directing examiners to the suspected structures and aiding in the differentiation of the cause of pain. However, even when positive findings are identified in one structure, other structures should be screened for coexisting pathologies or alternative diagnoses. A thorough examination of the most painful site must be ensured. Adopting this comprehensive approach leads to a more accurate evaluation of medial elbow pain.

Notes

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: Cho MJ, Chai JW. Data acquisition: Cho MJ, Chai JW, Kim DH, Kim HJ, Seo J. Data analysis or interpretation: Cho MJ, Chai JW, Kim DH, Kim HJ, Seo J. Drafting of the manuscript: Cho MJ, Chai JW. Critical revision of the manuscript: Cho MJ, Chai JW, Kim DH, Kim HJ, Seo J. Approval of the final version of the manuscript: all authors.

Conflict of Interest

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Supplementary Material

Video clip 1.

A 28-year-old woman with ulnar nerve instability in the right elbow. The short-axis view of the cubital tunnel and medial epicondyle during elbow flexion reveals transient anterior displacement of the ulnar nerve over the medial epicondyle. The ulnar nerve returns to its original location with elbow extension (https://doi.org/10.14366/usg.24102).

Video clip 2.

A 35-year-old man with snapping triceps syndrome in the left elbow. The short-axis view of the cubital tunnel and medial epicondyle during elbow flexion shows anterior displacement of the ulnar nerve, with the triceps muscle belly following shortly after in a similar fashion. Both the triceps muscle and ulnar nerve return to their original locations with elbow extension (https://doi.org/10.14366/usg.24102).

References

1. Barco R, Antuna SA. Medial elbow pain. EFORT Open Rev 2017;2:362–371.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
2. Kane SF, Lynch JH, Taylor JC. Evaluation of elbow pain in adults. Am Fam Physician 2014;89:649–657.
pmid
3. Martinoli C. Musculoskeletal ultrasound: technical guidelines. Insights Imaging 2010;1:99–141.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
4. Van Holsbeeck MT, Introcaso JH. Musculoskeletal ultrasound. 3rd ed. New Delhi: Jaypee Brothers Medical Pub, 2016.

5. Konin GP, Nazarian LN, Walz DM. US of the elbow: indications, technique, normal anatomy, and pathologic conditions. Radiographics 2013;33:E125–E147.
crossref pmid
6. Jacobson JA. Fundamentals of musculoskeletal ultrasound. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier, 2012.

7. Miller TT, Reinus WR. Nerve entrapment syndromes of the elbow, forearm, and wrist. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010;195:585–594.
crossref pmid
8. Bianchi S, Martinoli C, Abdelwahab IF, Baert AL, Derchi LE, Rizzatto G, et al. Ultrasound of the musculoskeletal system. Heidelberg: Springer, 2007.

9. Ciccotti MC, Schwartz MA, Ciccotti MG. Diagnosis and treatment of medial epicondylitis of the elbow. Clin Sports Med 2004;23:693–705.
crossref pmid
10. Walz DM, Newman JS, Konin GP, Ross G. Epicondylitis: pathogenesis, imaging, and treatment. Radiographics 2010;30:167–184.
crossref pmid
11. Park GY, Lee SM, Lee MY. Diagnostic value of ultrasonography for clinical medial epicondylitis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2008;89:738–742.
crossref pmid
12. Miller TT, Shapiro MA, Schultz E, Kalish PE. Comparison of sonography and MRI for diagnosing epicondylitis. J Clin Ultrasound 2002;30:193–202.
crossref pmid
13. Levin D, Nazarian LN, Miller TT, O'Kane PL, Feld RI, Parker L, et al. Lateral epicondylitis of the elbow: US findings. Radiology 2005;237:230–234.
crossref pmid
14. Van Hofwegen C, Baker CL 3rd, Baker CL Jr. Epicondylitis in the athlete's elbow. Clin Sports Med 2010;29:577–597.
crossref pmid
15. Griffith JF. Diagnostic ultrasound: musculoskeletal. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier, 2015.

16. Khoury V, Cardinal E. "Tenomalacia": a new sonographic sign of tendinopathy? Eur Radiol 2009;19:144–146.
crossref pmid pdf
17. Wu VJ, Thon S, Finley Z, Bohlen H, Schwartz Z, O'Brien MJ, et al. Double-row repair for recalcitrant medial epicondylitis. Orthop J Sports Med 2019;7:2325967119885608.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
18. Gabel GT, Morrey BF. Operative treatment of medical epicondylitis: influence of concomitant ulnar neuropathy at the elbow. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1995;77:1065–1069.
crossref pmid
19. Han SH, Lee JK, Kim HJ, Lee SH, Kim JW, Kim TS. The result of surgical treatment of medial epicondylitis: analysis with more than a 5-year follow-up. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2016;25:1704–1709.
crossref pmid
20. Shahid M, Wu F, Deshmukh SC. Operative treatment improves patient function in recalcitrant medial epicondylitis. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2013;95:486–488.
crossref pmid pmc
21. Kurvers H, Verhaar J. The results of operative treatment of medial epicondylitis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1995;77:1374–1379.
crossref pmid
22. Feindel W, Stratford J. The role of the cubital tunnel in tardy ulnar palsy. Can J Surg 1958;1:287–300.
pmid
23. Feindel W, Stratford J. Cubital tunnel compression in tardy ulnar palsy. Can Med Assoc J 1958;78:351–353.
pmid pmc
24. Neal S, Fields KB. Peripheral nerve entrapment and injury in the upper extremity. Am Fam Physician 2010;81:147–155.
pmid
25. Hariri S, McAdams TR. Nerve injuries about the elbow. Clin Sports Med 2010;29:655–675.
crossref pmid
26. Dy CJ, Mackinnon SE. Ulnar neuropathy: evaluation and management. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 2016;9:178–184.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
27. Kutlay M, Colak A, Simsek H, Ozturk E, Senol MG, Topuz K, et al. Use of ultrasonography in ulnar nerve entrapment surgery: a prospective study. Neurosurg Rev 2009;32:225–232.
crossref pmid pdf
28. Robertson C, Saratsiotis J. A review of compressive ulnar neuropathy at the elbow. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2005;28:345.
crossref pmid
29. Wali AR, Gabel B, Mitwalli M, Tubbs RS, Brown JM. Clarification of eponymous anatomical terminology: structures named after Dr Geoffrey V. Osborne that compress the ulnar nerve at the elbow. Hand (N Y) 2017;13:1558944717708030.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
30. Schertz M, Mutschler C, Masmejean E, Silvera J. High-resolution ultrasound in etiological evaluation of ulnar neuropathy at the elbow. Eur J Radiol 2017;95:111–117.
crossref pmid
31. Choi SJ, Ahn JH, Ryu DS, Kang CH, Jung SM, Park MS, et al. Ultrasonography for nerve compression syndromes of the upper extremity. Ultrasonography 2015;34:275–291.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
32. Kawanishi Y, Miyake J, Omori S, Murase T, Shimada K. The association between cubital tunnel morphology and ulnar neuropathy in patients with elbow osteoarthritis. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2014;23:938–945.
crossref pmid
33. Ng ES, Vijayan J, Therimadasamy AK, Tan TC, Chan YC, Lim A, et al. High resolution ultrasonography in the diagnosis of ulnar nerve lesions with particular reference to post-traumatic lesions and sites outside the elbow. Clin Neurophysiol 2011;122:188–193.
crossref pmid
34. Cartwright MS, Shin HW, Passmore LV, Walker FO. Ultrasonographic findings of the normal ulnar nerve in adults. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2007;88:394–396.
crossref pmid
35. Schwabl C, Schmidle G, Kaiser P, Drakonaki E, Taljanovic MS, Klauser AS. Nerve entrapment syndromes: detection by ultrasound. Ultrasonography 2023;42:376–387.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
36. Beekman R, Visser LH, Verhagen WI. Ultrasonography in ulnar neuropathy at the elbow: a critical review. Muscle Nerve 2011;43:627–635.
crossref pmid pdf
37. Wiesler ER, Chloros GD, Cartwright MS, Shin HW, Walker FO. Ultrasound in the diagnosis of ulnar neuropathy at the cubital tunnel. J Hand Surg Am 2006;31:1088–1093.
crossref pmid
38. Chiou HJ, Chou YH, Cheng SP, Hsu CC, Chan RC, Tiu CM, et al. Cubital tunnel syndrome: diagnosis by high-resolution ultrasonography. J Ultrasound Med 1998;17:643–648.
crossref pmid pdf
39. Chang KV, Wu WT, Han DS, Ozcakar L. Ulnar nerve cross-sectional area for the diagnosis of cubital tunnel syndrome: a meta-analysis of ultrasonographic measurements. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2018;99:743–757.
crossref pmid
40. Letissier H, Dardenne G, Saraux A, Le Nen D, Borotikar B, Jousse-Joulin S. Ultrasound ulnar nerve measurement in a healthy population. Rheumatol Ther 2021;8:457–466.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
41. Yoon JS, Walker FO, Cartwright MS. Ultrasonographic swelling ratio in the diagnosis of ulnar neuropathy at the elbow. Muscle Nerve 2008;38:1231–1235.
crossref pmid
42. Omejec G, Podnar S. Does ulnar nerve dislocation at the elbow cause neuropathy? Muscle Nerve 2016;53:255–259.
crossref pmid
43. Cornelson SM, Sclocco R, Kettner NW. Ulnar nerve instability in the cubital tunnel of asymptomatic volunteers. J Ultrasound 2019;22:337–344.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
44. O'Driscoll SW, Horii E, Carmichael SW, Morrey BF. The cubital tunnel and ulnar neuropathy. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1991;73:613–617.
pmid
45. Granger A, Sardi JP, Iwanaga J, Wilson TJ, Yang L, Loukas M, et al. Osborne's ligament: a review of its history, anatomy, and surgical importance. Cureus 2017;9:e1080.
crossref pmid pmc
46. Assmus H, Antoniadis G, Bischoff C, Hoffmann R, Martini AK, Preissler P, et al. Cubital tunnel syndrome: a review and management guidelines. Cent Eur Neurosurg 2011;72:90–98.
crossref pmid
47. Kawahara Y, Yamaguchi T, Honda Y, Tomita Y, Uetani M. The ulnar nerve at elbow extension and flexion: assessment of position and signal intensity on MR images. Radiology 2016;280:483–492.
crossref pmid
48. Spinner RJ, Goldner RD. Snapping of the medial head of the triceps and recurrent dislocation of the ulnar nerve: anatomical and dynamic factors. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1998;80:239–247.
pmid
49. Vanhees MK, Geurts GF, Van Riet RP. Snapping triceps syndrome: a review of the literature. Shoulder Elbow 2010;2:30–33.
crossref pdf
50. Jacobson JA, Jebson PJ, Jeffers AW, Fessell DP, Hayes CW. Ulnar nerve dislocation and snapping triceps syndrome: diagnosis with dynamic sonography: report of three cases. Radiology 2001;220:601–605.
crossref pmid
51. Watts AC, McEachan J, Reid J, Rymaszewski L. The snapping elbow: a diagnostic pitfall. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2009;18:e9–e10.
crossref pmid
52. Spinner RJ, An KN, Kim KJ, Goldner RD, O'Driscoll SW. Medial or lateral dislocation (snapping) of a portion of the distal triceps: a biomechanical, anatomic explanation. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2001;10:561–567.
crossref pmid
53. Rioux-Forker D, Bridgeman J, Brogan DM. Snapping triceps syndrome. J Hand Surg Am 2018;43:90–e91.
crossref pmid
54. Callaway GH, Field LD, Deng XH, Torzilli PA, O'Brien SJ, Altchek DW, et al. Biomechanical evaluation of the medial collateral ligament of the elbow. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1997;79:1223–1231.
crossref pmid
55. Zaremski JL, Vincent KR, Vincent HK. Elbow ulnar collateral ligament: injury, treatment options, and recovery in overhead throwing athletes. Curr Sports Med Rep 2019;18:338–345.
crossref pmid
56. Dugas J, Chronister J, Cain EL Jr, Andrews JR. Ulnar collateral ligament in the overhead athlete: a current review. Sports Med Arthrosc Rev 2014;22:169–182.
pmid
57. Werner SL, Fleisig GS, Dillman CJ, Andrews JR. Biomechanics of the elbow during baseball pitching. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1993;17:274–278.
crossref pmid
58. Patel RM, Lynch TS, Amin NH, Calabrese G, Gryzlo SM, Schickendantz MS. The thrower's elbow. Orthop Clin North Am 2014;45:355–376.
crossref pmid
59. Miller TT, Adler RS, Friedman L. Sonography of injury of the ulnar collateral ligament of the elbow-initial experience. Skeletal Radiol 2004;33:386–391.
crossref pmid pdf
60. Freehill MT, Safran MR. Diagnosis and management of ulnar collateral ligament injuries in throwers. Curr Sports Med Rep 2011;10:271–278.
crossref pmid
61. Park JY, Kim H, Lee JH, Heo T, Park H, Chung SW, et al. Valgus stress ultrasound for medial ulnar collateral ligament injuries in athletes: is ultrasound alone enough for diagnosis? J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2020;29:578–586.
crossref pmid
62. Sutterer BJ, Boettcher BJ, Payne JM, Camp CL, Sellon JL. The role of ultrasound in the evaluation of elbow medial ulnar collateral ligament injuries in throwing athletes. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 2022;15:535–546.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
63. Nazarian LN, McShane JM, Ciccotti MG, O'Kane PL, Harwood MI. Dynamic US of the anterior band of the ulnar collateral ligament of the elbow in asymptomatic major league baseball pitchers. Radiology 2003;227:149–154.
crossref pmid
64. Meng S, Platzgummer H, Loizides A, Chang KV, Gruber H. Ultrasound of small nerves. Ultraschall Med 2022;43:12–33.
crossref pmid
65. Kim JM, Kim B, Yoon JS. Ultrasonographic identification of the high-risk zone for medial antebrachial cutaneous nerve injury in the elbow. Ann Rehabil Med 2022;46:185–191.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
66. Chang KV, Mezian K, Nanka O, Wu WT, Lou YM, Wang JC, et al. Ultrasound imaging for the cutaneous nerves of the extremities and relevant entrapment syndromes: from anatomy to clinical implications. J Clin Med 2018;7:457.
crossref pmid pmc
67. Cesmebasi A, O'Driscoll SW, Smith J, Skinner JA, Spinner RJ. The snapping medial antebrachial cutaneous nerve. Clin Anat 2015;28:872–877.
crossref pmid pdf
68. Biswas D, Wysocki RW, Cohen MS. Primary and posttraumatic arthritis of the elbow. Arthritis 2013;2013:473259.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
69. Konarski W, Pobozy T, Kotela A, Hordowicz M, Pobozy K. Ultrasound in the differential diagnosis of medial epicondylalgia and medial elbow pain-imaging findings and narrative literature review. Healthcare (Basel) 2022;10:1529.
crossref pmid pmc
70. Adla DN, Stanley D. Primary elbow osteoarthritis: an updated review. Shoulder Elbow 2011;3:41–48.
crossref pdf
71. Kato H, Hirayama T, Minami A, Iwasaki N, Hirachi K. Cubital tunnel syndrome associated with medial elbow ganglia and osteoarthritis of the elbow. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2002;84:1413–1419.
crossref pmid
72. De Maeseneer M, Jacobson JA, Jaovisidha S, Lenchik L, Ryu KN, Trudell DR, et al. Elbow effusions: distribution of joint fluid with flexion and extension and imaging implications. Invest Radiol 1998;33:117–125.
pmid

Two common positions for evaluating the medial elbow with ultrasonography.

A. The seated position and probe placement enable a rapid and straightforward examination of the medial elbow in the long axis. B. The supine position and probe placement provide greater comfort for dynamic assessment.
usg-24102f1.jpg
Fig. 1.

Normal long-axis ultrasound (US) image of the medial elbow and corresponding magnetic resonance (MR) image.

The long-axis US image (A) and the corresponding MR fat-suppressed proton density coronal image (B) display the normal appearance of the common flexor tendon (double-headed arrow) and muscle (m). The anterior band of the ulnar collateral ligament (arrowheads) is situated deep to the common flexor tendon, extending from the medial epicondyle (ME) to the sublime tubercle of the ulna (U).
usg-24102f2.jpg
Fig. 2.

Normal short-axis ultrasound (US) image of the posteromedial elbow and corresponding magnetic resonance (MR) image.

The short-axis US image (A) and the corresponding MR T2-weighted axial image (B) display the normal appearance of the cubital tunnel and the ulnar nerve. The cubital tunnel is a fibro-osseous channel that lies between the medial epicondyle (ME) and the olecranon (O). This structure is covered by the cubital tunnel retinaculum (arrowheads), with the posterior band (arrows) of the ulnar collateral ligament forming its floor. Within the cubital tunnel, the ulnar nerve (asterisk) exhibits a normal fascicular pattern with hypoechoic neural bundles. A, anconeus; P, pronator teres.
usg-24102f3.jpg
Fig. 3.

Ultrasound (US) findings of medial epicondylitis.

A. Long-axis US images of the medial elbow in a 55-year-old woman reveal swelling, hypoechoic change, and outward bowing of the common flexor tendon (arrowheads). B. Doppler US image of the same patient displays neovascularization in the tendon. C. Long-axis view of the medial elbow in a 63-year-old man shows a small calcification (arrow) in the common flexor tendon and a focal low-echoic area, indicative of a small tendon tear (arrowheads). ME, medial epicondyle.
usg-24102f4.jpg
Fig. 4.

Radiograph and ultrasound (US) images of a 61-year-old woman with calcific tendinitis of the common flexor tendon.

A. Oblique radiograph of the elbow reveals fluffy and cloudy calcifications (arrows) at the insertion of the common flexor tendon near the medial epicondyle (ME) of the humerus. B. Long-axis US image of the medial elbow displays an amorphous calcific deposit within the common flexor tendon, exhibiting minimal posterior acoustic shadowing. U, ulna; R, radius.
usg-24102f5.jpg
Fig. 5.

Schematic drawing depicting common sites of ulnar nerve entrapment.

The Osborne band (fascia) is shown as the fascia that covers the humeral and ulnar heads of the flexor carpi ulnaris, as originally described. The cubital tunnel retinaculum, which is distinct from the Osborne fascia, forms the roof of the cubital tunnel.
usg-24102f6.jpg
Fig. 6.

Ultrasound images of the posteromedial elbow at the level of the cubital tunnel in a 25-year-old woman with ulnar neuropathy.

A. Short-axis view at the cubital tunnel reveals a hypoechoic, enlarged ulnar nerve (asterisk) situated between the medial epicondyle (ME) and the olecranon (O). The cross-sectional area of the ulnar nerve is 10.4 mm2. The cubital tunnel retinaculum (arrowheads) is visible as a hyperechoic membranous structure covering the cubital tunnel. B. Long-axis view of the cubital tunnel demonstrates segmental enlargement of the ulnar nerve (asterisk) at the proximal cubital tunnel, while the distal ulnar nerve exhibits a normal hyperechoic fascicular appearance (arrows).
usg-24102f7.jpg
Fig. 7.

Patient positioning and probe placement for ulnar nerve instability testing, along with corresponding ultrasound images.

A. By placing the transducer at the cubital tunnel with minimal pressure, the examiner can observe whether the ulnar nerve displaces from the cubital tunnel upon elbow flexion. B-D. Short-axis ultrasound images obtained at the posteromedial elbow demonstrate the ulnar nerve in various positions during elbow flexion. B. In a 28-year-old man, the ulnar nerve (asterisk) is located posterior to the medial epicondyle (ME), which is its typical position during elbow flexion. C. In a 29-year-old woman, the ulnar nerve (asterisk) is subluxated at the apex of the ME during elbow flexion. D. In a 58-year-old man, the ulnar nerve (asterisk) is completely dislocated and positioned anterior to the ME during elbow flexion. Tri, triceps brachii.
usg-24102f8.jpg
Fig. 8.

Dynamic ultrasound images of a 22-year-old man with snapping medial triceps syndrome.

A. Short-axis view of the posteromedial elbow in extension reveals the ulnar nerve (asterisk) located posterior to the medial epicondyle (ME). B. Short-axis view of the flexed elbow demonstrates dislocation of the ulnar nerve (asterisk) anterior to the ME. C. Short-axis view of the fully flexed elbow illustrates subluxation of the medial triceps muscle belly (arrows) over the ME pushing the ulnar nerve (asterisk) anteriorly. Tri, triceps brachii.
usg-24102f9.jpg
Fig. 9.

A 27-year-old man who presented with right medial elbow pain that arose while he was doing push-ups.

The patient had a history of right medial elbow injury sustained during gymnastics in middle school. A. Dynamic ultrasound (US) with valgus stress can be performed with the patient’s arm abducted and the elbow flexed. The US probe should visualize the ulnar collateral ligament and medial joint space while the examiner applies a valgus force by pressing down on the patient’s forearm or hand to expand the medial joint space of the elbow. B-E. Dynamic US images with valgus stress on the bilateral elbow are presented for comparison. B. Long-axis image of the normal left medial elbow shows the ulnar collateral ligament (arrows) with a low-echoic appearance due to anisotropy artifact. C. When valgus stress is applied, the ulnar collateral ligament (arrows) straightens, appears hyperechoic, and demonstrates a normal fibrillar appearance. Note that the medial joint space shows little change with valgus stress. D. Long-axis image obtained from the injured right medial elbow reveals thickening and a low-echoic change in the ulnar collateral ligament (arrows). E. With valgus stress applied, the medial joint space expands, with a joint space difference of more than 2 mm. Note the focal sagging (arrowhead) of the overlying flexor muscle into the widened joint space, indicating discontinuity of the ulnar collateral ligament. ME, medial epicondyle; U, ulna.
usg-24102f10.jpg
Fig. 10.

Schematic representation of the anatomy, ultrasound (US) probe placement, and corresponding US image of the medial antebrachial cutaneous nerve at the right elbow.

A. The medial antebrachial cutaneous nerve runs alongside the basilic vein and medial to the biceps muscle, which can serve as a landmark for locating the nerve. B. Corresponding US image displays the biceps brachii muscle (Biceps), brachialis, brachial vein (V), brachial artery (A), median nerve (M), and anterior branch of the medial antebrachial cutaneous nerve (dotted line).
usg-24102f11.jpg
Fig. 11.

A 51-year-old woman who presented with right elbow pain.

A. Short-axis view at the posteromedial elbow reveals a distended posteromedial synovial recess between the medial epicondyle (ME) and olecranon (O), accompanied by effusion (E) and synovial hypertrophy (arrowheads). B. Longitudinal Doppler ultrasound view of the anterolateral elbow demonstrates mass-like synovial thickening (arrowheads) with hyperemia in the elbow joint. C, capitellum; R, radius.
usg-24102f12.jpg
Fig. 12.

A 15-year-old boy who presented with a painful mass at the medial elbow, diagnosed as Kimura lymphadenopathy.

A. Short-axis ultrasound image reveals an irregularly shaped, hypoechoic mass (asterisk) with vascularity in the subcutaneous layer of the medial epitrochlear area. B. Corresponding T1-weighted magnetic resonance image displays a mass (asterisk) with low signal intensity situated adjacent to the basilic vein (B) in the epitrochlear area, strongly indicative of lymph node enlargement.
usg-24102f13.jpg
Fig. 13.
Table 1.
Possible diagnoses, clinical features and corresponding US checklists for medial elbow pain
Diagnosis Characteristic clinical features US checklists
Medial epicondylitis Activities involving repetitive valgus stress and flexion, tenderness just distal to the medial epicondyle Common flexor tendon
Ulnar neuropathy Numbness and tingling in the ulnar side forearm/hand as well as the fourth and fifth fingers Ulnar nerve and cubital tunnel
Cubital tunnel syndrome Same as above Cause of entrapment
Ulnar nerve instability +Medial snapping during flexion Dynamic instability
Snapping triceps syndrome +Medial double snapping during flexion Triceps medial head
Ulnar collateral ligament injury Overhead throwers, valgus instability Ulnar collateral ligament
Dynamic US with stress
Medial antebrachial cutaneous neuropathy Often associated with distal biceps tendon tear, iatrogenic injury Medial antebrachial cutaneous nerves
Arthritis Clinical history of overuse, trauma, inflammatory arthritis, or gout Elbow joint

US, ultrasound.

TOOLS
METRICS
0
Crossref
0
Scopus
1,742
View
116
Download
Editorial Office
A-304 Mapo Trapalace, 53 Mapo-daero, Mapo-gu, Seoul 04158, Korea
TEL : +82-2-763-5627   FAX : +82-2-763-6909   E-mail : office@ultrasound.or.kr
About |  Browse Articles |  Current Issue |  For Authors and Reviewers
Copyright © Korean Society of Ultrasound in Medicine.                 Developed in M2PI
Zoom in Close layer