Ultrasonography Search

CLOSE


Ultrasound-guided attenuation parameter (UGAP) for identifying metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease: a prospective study
Yun-Lin Huang1 , Chao Sun2 , Ying Wang1, Juan Cheng1, Shi-Wen Wang1, Li Wei1, Xiu-Yun Lu1, Rui Cheng1, Ming Wang1, Jian-Gao Fan2 , Yi Dong1
1Department of Ultrasound, Xinhua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
2Department of Gastroenterology, Xinhua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai Key Lab of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition, 1665 Kong Jiang Road, Shanghai, China, Shanghai, China
Corresponding Author: Yi Dong ,Tel: 86 (0)21- 25076104, Fax: 86 (0)21- 25076104, Email: drdaisydong@hotmail.com
Received: November 12, 2024;  Accepted: December 19, 2024.  Published online: December 19, 2024.
ABSTRACT
Purpose:
To evaluate the performance of ultrasound-guided attenuation parameter (UGAP) for diagnosing and grading hepatic steatosis in patients with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) using magnetic resonance imaging proton density fat fraction (MRI-PDFF) as the reference.
Methods:
Patients with hepatic steatosis were enrolled in this prospective study and underwent UGAP measurements. Taking MRI-PDFF ≥ 5 %, ≥ 15 %, and ≥ 25 % as the reference for diagnosing steatosis grade ≥ S1, ≥ S2, and S3, respectively. Spearman correlation and area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) were performed.
Results:
From July 2023 to June 2024, 88 patients (median age: 40 years, interquartile range [IQR]: 36 – 46]; 54.5 % [48/88] men and 45.5 % [40/88] women) were included; 22.7 % (20/88), 50.0 % (44/88), 21.6 % (19/88), and 5.7 % (5/88) of patients had S0, S1, S2, and S3, respectively. The successful rate of UGAP measurements was 100 %. The median UGAP value was 0.74 dB/cm/MHz (IQR: 0.65 – 0.82). UGAP values were positively correlated with MRI-PDFF (r = 0.77, P < 0.001). The AUCs of UGAP for diagnosing steatosis grade ≥ S1, ≥ S2, and S3 were 0.91, 0.90, and 0.88, respectively. In the subgroup, 98.4 % (60/61) of patients had valid controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) values. UGAP values were positively correlated with CAP values (r = 0.65, P < 0.001).
Conclusion:
UDFF has excellent diagnostic performance in detecting and grading hepatic steatosis using MRI-PDFF as the reference standard and can be potentially used in clinical practice.
Keywords: Ultrasound-guided attenuation parameter; Magnetic resonance imaging proton density fat fra; Controlled attenuation parameter; Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver ; Quantification; Noninvasive
TOOLS
METRICS
0
Crossref
132
View
1
Download
Editorial Office
A-304 Mapo Trapalace, 53 Mapo-daero, Mapo-gu, Seoul 04158, Korea
TEL : +82-2-763-5627   FAX : +82-2-763-6909   E-mail : office@ultrasound.or.kr
About |  Browse Articles |  Current Issue |  For Authors and Reviewers
Copyright © Korean Society of Ultrasound in Medicine.                 Developed in M2PI
Zoom in Close layer