Journal of Korean Society of Ultrasound in Medicine 2008;27(4): 221-228.
Sonographic Diagnosis of Epidermal Inclusion Cysts in the Trunk and Extremities.
Sun Hee Hur, Min Hee Lee, Ji Young Hwang
1Department of Radiology, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
2Department of Radiology and Medical Research Institute, School of Medicine, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Korea.
  Published online: December 1, 2008.
PURPOSE: This study was designed to evaluate the sonographic findings of epidermal inclusion cysts in the trunk and extremities and to determine distinguishable features from other soft tissue masses. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Of 263 soft tissue masses that were evaluated on ultrasound and were surgically confirmed, 27 epidermal inclusion cysts in the trunk and extremities were selected. The anatomic locations were the chest wall (n = 4), abdominal wall (n = 2), buttocks (n = 9) and extremities (n = 12). Two radiologists retrospectively reviewed the sonograms for the following features: location within the superficial tissue, size, margin, echogenicity, internal echotexture with characteristic patterns, presence of posterior enhancement with lateral shadowing and internal vascularity. RESULTS: All of the masses were located in the subcutaneous layer and had a well-defined margin. The longest diameter of a mass ranged from 0.9-7.4 cm. Of 27 masses, 18 (66.7%) masses were hypoechoic, seven (25.9%) masses were isoechoic and two (7.4%) masses were hyperechoic compared with the surrounding subcutaneous layer. Internal echotexture was heterogeneous in 26 (96.3%) masses and was seen with the following patterns. Hypoechoic/anechoic rod shapes with echogenic fragments were seen in ten masses, focal hypoechoic portions with round to oval shape were seen in four masses, peripheral layering was seen in three masses and only echogenic fragments were seen in two masses. Two lesions had both internal patterns. Posterior enhancement was present in 24 (88.9%) masses and lateral shadowing was present in 21 (77.8%) masses. Twenty-four masses (88.9%) had no vascularity, but three masses showed an increased color signal in the periphery of the masses, which was associated with rupture in two and with infection in one mass. CONCLUSION: Sonographic diagnosis of an epidermal inclusion cyst may be established when a well-defined, avascular mass with characteristic internal heterogeneity is located in the subcutaneous layer of the trunk and extremities.
Keywords: Epidermal inclusion cyst; Soft tissue; Sonography
Full text via DOI  Full text via DOI
We recommend
Editorial Office
A-304 Mapo Trapalace, 53 Mapo-daero, Mapo-gu, Seoul 04158, Korea
TEL : +82-2-763-5627   FAX : +82-2-763-6909   E-mail :
About |  Browse Articles |  Current Issue |  For Authors and Reviewers
Copyright © Korean Society of Ultrasound in Medicine.                 Developed in M2PI
Zoom in Close layer